Environment & Energy

It is therefote not safe; it is not sustainable.

The advocates of this land and material intensive trillion dollar useless farce have no interest in fossil fuels, never have, never will.

Instead they pollute this thread with insipid nonsense about radioactivity about which they know zero, and carry on in support of fossil fuels, on which, again, so called "renewable energy" depends.

The OP is about the collapse of the planetary atmosphere, taking place after the rise of antinukism.

Scientists are trained to look at data and if the data conflicts with the theory or hypothesis, they do not reject the data, but rather the theory or hypothesis.

By contrast, no amount of data or information can change the dogma of a cult.

The OP is data and information to which cultists n response are chanting their tiresome dogma.

The planet is burning. Clearly in the cults, they couldn't care less.

Jim Jones didn't have anything on antinukes, nothing at all.

Antinukism kills not only people, but beyond that is killing the planet.

Got it?

No?

Why am I not surprised.?