Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John ONeill

(92 posts)
17. Breeding in Candus
Sun May 3, 2026, 07:38 AM
12 hrs ago

The ANEEL fuel intended to burn thorium in Candus needs HALEU at 12 to 20% fissile as a starter for each fuel bundle (or equivalent concentration of plutonium), and will not be a true breeder, with conversion ratios below 1.0. CopAtomx should get much better neutron economy even than a Candu -
1/ there's no xenon 135 in the core, it's rapidly outgassed from the salt, just from vapour pressure, at 700 C
2/ Unlike with an ANEEL fuel bundle, there's no high neutron cross section protactinium in the core (it's all in the blanket, and with the thorium to protactinium ratio there at about 1000 to one, parasitic neutron losses should be low)
3/ the spherical core geometry, with heavy water inside and around it, and a breeding blanket round that, minimises leakage.
CA claim they can breed with 5% LEU (or equivalent in transuranics), at about 1.1 breeding ratio once they fully convert to U233, and so grow more quickly than a fast reactor fleet. If they fail, there are plenty of fast neutron contenders - Russia's BREST 300 and BN1200, Newcleo in France and Italy, Terrapower's Natrium in Wyoming, Blykalla in Sweden - but thermal spectrum reactors so far have had a better operational record. Maybe even Japan's reduced moderation boiling water concept could breed ... but nobody's working on that, CA have hardware nearly ready for low power fission testing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks. Sadly, I believe we've waited too long and we're toast. surfered Friday #1
This is true. I went to a lecture last night by a scientist last night which focused on getting people to... NNadir Friday #2
Commentary: Nuclear power must be part of New York's energy solution OKIsItJustMe Friday #3
Dr. Hansen and I agree on nuclear energy. I disagree that so called "renewable energy" is worth the land and money... NNadir Friday #4
Fortunately you don't make decisions for the world OKIsItJustMe Friday #5
Hansen advocates for both renewables and nuclear energy thought crime Friday #6
He's right about one; wrong about the other. It is inexcusable to spend trillions of dollars on so called... NNadir Yesterday #8
IEA: Rapid clean energy deployment displaces fossil fuels and lowers emissions OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #11
Hansen John ONeill Yesterday #7
Copenhagen Atomics is an interesting little company with which I have passing familiarity. I'm mostly amused... NNadir Yesterday #9
Breeding in Candus John ONeill 12 hrs ago #17
A Candu would not need HALEU in the case where it is started by plutonium. Outgassing Xe will change... NNadir 11 hrs ago #18
Transatomic .. John ONeill 27 min ago #19
Bookmarking.nt jfz9580m Yesterday #10
A world economy powered by renewable energy may have been plausible fifty years ago... hunter Yesterday #12
It hasn't been possible since the 19th century, which was when it was abandoned for a reason. NNadir Yesterday #13
I say plausible because the actual capabilities of renewable energy were still unknown. hunter 17 hrs ago #15
Fair enough. I fully confess that there was a time I thought it reasonable. NNadir 14 hrs ago #16
I would argue that it is more plausible today, but not practical OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate Scientist James H...»Reply #17