Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,396 posts)
2. This is true. I went to a lecture last night by a scientist last night which focused on getting people to...
Fri May 1, 2026, 11:57 AM
Friday

...believe that the collapse of the climate is real and is caused by human activity. It was this one, by John Pershing of Climate Central:

The John Rassweiler Impact Lecture with speaker Climate Central on the 20th Anniversary of D&R Greenway’s Johnson Education Center

It ended up being depressing, because it was all about whether people believe extreme global heating is real, and if they believe it's caused by human activities and so on.

In the Q&A - everyone in the room of course understood that climate change is real and caused by human activity - people were carrying on about solar and wind, and interestingly in a way that was completely contradictory, about maintaining land use.

As the gadfly, I spoke up for nuclear energy and in opposition to so called "renewable energy" by noting that people have been chain sawing Joshua Trees in California, cacti that are 100s of years old with vast root systems that sequester carbon, to install industrial solar plants that will be landfill in 20 to 25 years.

The Climate Central guy after indicating that climate central's role is not to endorse solutions - he went on the remark on something about the antinuke club the Union of Concerned "Scientists" while acknowledging it was just that, an antinuke organization - but rather to get people to understand what's happening.

I pointed out that I monitor the Mauna Loa CO2 regularly and that in 2000 the concentration of the dangerous fossil fuel waste peaked at 372 ppm and that this week we're running at about 432 ppm, and that it's a little late, too late in fact, to be quibbling.

It was, in the end, depressing.

We are indeed, out of time. There are nuclear engineers, my son among them I'm proud to say, who are trying to save what is left to save and can be saved, but every day there is less and less that can be saved.

We're cooked.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks. Sadly, I believe we've waited too long and we're toast. surfered Friday #1
This is true. I went to a lecture last night by a scientist last night which focused on getting people to... NNadir Friday #2
Commentary: Nuclear power must be part of New York's energy solution OKIsItJustMe Friday #3
Dr. Hansen and I agree on nuclear energy. I disagree that so called "renewable energy" is worth the land and money... NNadir Friday #4
Fortunately you don't make decisions for the world OKIsItJustMe Friday #5
Where are these nasty "anti-nuke" cultists anyway? thought crime 10 hrs ago #21
In response to this question, I would like to state that a mirror is useful device. NNadir 3 hrs ago #22
Hansen advocates for both renewables and nuclear energy thought crime Friday #6
He's right about one; wrong about the other. It is inexcusable to spend trillions of dollars on so called... NNadir Saturday #8
IEA: Rapid clean energy deployment displaces fossil fuels and lowers emissions OKIsItJustMe Saturday #11
Hansen John ONeill Saturday #7
Copenhagen Atomics is an interesting little company with which I have passing familiarity. I'm mostly amused... NNadir Saturday #9
Breeding in Candus John ONeill Yesterday #17
A Candu would not need HALEU in the case where it is started by plutonium. Outgassing Xe will change... NNadir Yesterday #18
Transatomic .. John ONeill 14 hrs ago #19
OK. I went to their webpage and looked. Their "spin" is lithium isotope... NNadir 49 min ago #23
Bookmarking.nt jfz9580m Saturday #10
A world economy powered by renewable energy may have been plausible fifty years ago... hunter Saturday #12
It hasn't been possible since the 19th century, which was when it was abandoned for a reason. NNadir Saturday #13
I say plausible because the actual capabilities of renewable energy were still unknown. hunter Yesterday #15
Fair enough. I fully confess that there was a time I thought it reasonable. NNadir Yesterday #16
I would argue that it is more plausible today, but not practical OKIsItJustMe Saturday #14
It's just getting started. Approaching 'critical mass' and it's Fun to watch it happening now. thought crime 12 hrs ago #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate Scientist James H...»Reply #2