Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: S&P 500 closed Friday 3/20 at 6506, down 1.5% #TREAS Yield # Hot PPI report (Wedn) Last 3 months average 6.6% (ann'd) [View all]progree
(12,939 posts)1. Some prior reports
Last edited Wed Mar 18, 2026, 03:41 AM - Edit history (13)
Most Recent First (reverse chronological order)FRIDAY MARCH 13 (REPORTS)
# GDP Q4 - 2nd estimate (there are 3 estimates in total)
The first estimate of 1.4% growth rate has now been revised down in a shocking surprise to just a 0.7% growth rate (these are quarterly growths at an annualized rates). The 2025 whole year growth now stands at 2.2%
LBN THREAD: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143631718
# PCE Inflation Index, January,
LBN THREAD: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143631718
Note the above thread is 99% focused on the GDP Q4 = 0.7% story, but it also reports that core PCE inflation reached 3.1% on a 12-month (year-over-year) basis
These graphs definitely show that inflation is not steady, and not coming down:
. . . https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3631734
The CORE PCE is the Federal Reserve's favorite gauge for forecasting FUTURE inflation. This doesn't fit the media's typical narrative that inflation is coming down or at worst "sticky".
Remember the graphs (and OP) on inflation are JANUARY. The FEBRUARY ones are likely to be uglier, given the CPI ones for February that came out 2 days ago --
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3630564
The Iran thing and the oil and LNG and fertilizer price spikes? The attack on Iran began on Saturday, February 28. So none of this is in the January report or graphs above. And isn't in the February CPI graphs either and won't be in the February PCE when that comes out April 9.
So, the above (January and February) may very likely be remembered as the "good ol' days" of the Trump II kakistocracy.
SOURCE URLS: 3/13/26 release: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE - https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-january-2026
. . . FULL RELEASE AND TABLES - https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/pi0126.pdf
. . . PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEPI
. . . CORE PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/PCEPILFE
# Personal Income and Personal Spending, January,
SOURCE URLS: 3/13/26 release: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE - https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-january-2026
. . . FULL RELEASE AND TABLES - https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/pi0126.pdf
# Durable-goods orders, January,
# JOLTS - Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, January,
Job openings inched up in January, data shows
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/job-openings-inched-up-in-january-data-shows-141624127.html
ECONOMY GROUP thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/1116101837
# Consumer sentiment (prelim), University of Michigan, March,
SOURCE: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/
GRAPH 10Y: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsr.pdf
Consumer sentiment dipped about 2%, reaching its lowest reading of the year. Interviews completed prior to the military action in Iran showed an improvement in sentiment from last month, but lower readings seen during the nine days thereafter completely erased those initial gains. Gasoline prices have exerted the most immediate impact felt by consumers, though the magnitude of passthrough to other prices remains highly uncertain. A broad swath of consumers across incomes, age, and political affiliation all reported declines in expectations for their personal finances, down 7.5% nationally. Interviews for this release were collected between February 17 and March 9, with about half completed after the start of the US military conflict in Iran ((which began February 28 -progree)).
THURSDAY MARCH 12 (REPORTS)
# Unemployment Insurance Claims, week ending March 7
US weekly jobless claims edge down, Reuters, 3/12/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-weekly-jobless-claims-edge-124244249.html
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 213,000 for the week ended March 7,
The number of people receiving unemployment benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, dropped 21,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.850 million during the week ended February 28,
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
This report's permalink: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OPA/newsreleases/ui-claims/20260435.pdf
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
* The source URL has graphs, so one can see the trend over a year
# Trade Deficit, January
US trade deficit dropped by 25% in January, a win for Trump, Yahoo Finance, 3/12/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-trade-deficit-dropped-by-25-in-january-a-win-for-trump-140526564.html
# Housing Starts, February
# Building Permits, February
WEDNESDAY MARCH 11 (REPORTS)
# CPI Consumer Prices Index, February
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143630492
The 12 month graphs in the OP look nice and tame and even trending down slightly. But they both benefit by hot January 2025 to February 2025 numbers dropping out of the 12-month window: regular CPI: 2.73% annualized, and core CPI: 3.10% annualized. For the trend, what drops out of the 12 month window is every bit as important as what enters the 12-month window
GRAPHS: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3630564
Percent increases, seasonally adjusted numbers, ANNUALIZED
1 mo 3 mo 12mo
---- ---- ----
3.3% 3.0% 2.4% Regular CPI (includes food & energy)
2.6% 3.0% 2.5% Core CPI (does not have food or energy)
2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Federal Reserve Target
As for the trend,
For the regular CPI, The 3-month average increase (annualized) was at a local low of 2.2% in November but is now at 3.0%
For the core CPI, The 3-month average increase (annualized) was at a local low of 1.6% in November but is now at 3.0%
All of this is before any Iran effects of course (the U.S. - Israeli attack began on February 28).
And in March, the 12-month average is not helped at all by what drops out of the 12-month window: just a very small 0.40% annualized for the regular CPI, and an also very small 0.83% annualized for the core CPI. Not to mention the Iran effects hit full-force in March (if the war keeps on, even more so in April).
News summary https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
CPI data series: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0
Core CPI data series: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0L1E
As a sampler, here is one of the graphs

TUESDAY MARCH 10 (REPORTS)
# ADP Pulse Weekly Report of Private Payroll, last 4 weeks
ADP Pulse: +15,500 jobs/week average for the 4 weeks ending 2/21/26
Multiplying by 365 / (12*7) to "monthesize it" to the average month: 67,351
For comparison, the Bureau of Labor Statistics in their big "First Friday" report found 86,000 net private sector jobs LOST in February
The ultimate source: https://www.adpresearch.com/
and look for "NER Pulse"
# NFIB optimism index Feb.
# Existing home sales Feb.
US existing home sales unexpectedly increase as mortgage rates decline, Reuters, 3/10/26
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/finance-real-estate/us-existing-home-sales-unexpectedly-increase-as-mortgage-rates-decline/ar-AA1XVnL9
Home sales rose 1.7% last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.09 million units. Data for the prior month was revised up to show sales falling to a rate of 4.02 million units rather than the previously reported 3.91 million-unit pace.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast home resales decreasing to a rate of 3.89 million units last month.
Overall existing home sales, however, fell 1.4% on a year-over-year basis. The median existing home price last month increased 0.3% from a year ago to $398,000.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/finance-real-estate/us-existing-home-sales-unexpectedly-increase-as-mortgage-rates-decline/ar-AA1XVnL9
Home sales rose 1.7% last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.09 million units. Data for the prior month was revised up to show sales falling to a rate of 4.02 million units rather than the previously reported 3.91 million-unit pace.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast home resales decreasing to a rate of 3.89 million units last month.
Overall existing home sales, however, fell 1.4% on a year-over-year basis. The median existing home price last month increased 0.3% from a year ago to $398,000.
The ultimate source: https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/housing-statistics/existing-home-sales
FRIDAY MARCH 6 (Reports)
# Big "First Friday" BLS jobs report headlining non-farm payrolls and unemployment rate for February, released 3/6/26
Nonfarm payroll jobs FEBRUARY: -92,000, yes, MINUS 92,000 (and with prior 2 months revisions, -69,000, it's 161,000 fewer jobs than was reported in the January report that was released February 11),
(Contrast to the January report, released 2/11/26, where they said there were +130,000 jobs gained in January -- which was revised down a little bit to a still hefty (by recent standards) +126,000 in the February report)
The unemployment rate in the past 3 months: 4.4% to 4.3% to 4.4%
Black unemployment rate: Feb'25: 6.0%, , Jan'26: 7.3%, , Feb'26: 7.7%
The corresponding white unemployment rates are 3.8%, 3.7%, and 3.7%
Private sector nonfarm payroll jobs: -86,000 (Compare to Wednesday's non-government ADP report of +63,000 private sector jobs)
The big downward revision of December resulted in a 2025 job gain total of 116,000, which is an average of only 9,667/month
LBN Thread: democraticunderground.com/10143627754
The one (and only) bright spot: U-6 "underemployment rate" fell from 8.1% to 7.9%. This is essentially the official unemployment rate PLUS they count people who said they have looked for work in the past 12 months (vs. 4 weeks for the official unemployment rate) PLUS they count part-timers who say they want full-time work as underemployed (vs. the official unemployment rate that simply counts them as employed).
Ultimate source of the latest release: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Permanent copy of this February report is at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_03062026.htm
Permanent copy of the previous (January) report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02112026.htm
Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
Re: how can barely any jobs have been created in the past 12 months (156k, which averages to just 13k/month), while the unemployment rate has edged up only marginally (from 4.2% in February 2025 to 4.4% in February 2026?) - see 2 URLs just aboveLower Immigration Projections Mean Lower Breakeven Employment Growth Estimates, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 8/28/25
The old number: 150,000 jobs per month needed to keep the unemployment rate stable
The new number: 57,000 +/- 25,000 at a 90% confidence interval (think Heinz 57 varieties)
FFI: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143563268#post4
Diane Swonk at KPMG, 3/6/26: at 1:32 in the video: 10,000 +/- 30,000 jobs needed to hold unemployment rate steady
from https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/chief-economist-breaks-down-the-latest-jobs-report/vi-AA1XHf22
She doesn't say where that number comes from. It's quite significantly lower than the August 2025 Federal Reserve St. Louis number above.
The Labor Force has increased by only 42,000 in the past 12 months (an average of 3,500 per month). It's down 9,000 from May.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000
# Retail sales January delayed report: December: 0.0%, January: -0.2% ( -0.4% expected ), seasonally adjusted
Retail sales sagged in January, Wall St. Journal 3/6/26 (no paywall at this MSN-hosted article)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/retail-sales-sagged-in-january/ar-AA1XF2Mp
From the Source: https://www.census.gov/retail/index.html -- > https://www.census.gov/retail/sales.html :
. . . Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USN), Not Seasonally Adjusted:
. . . . . . https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USN
. . . Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USS), Seasonally Adjusted:
. . . . . . https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USS
These retail sales figures aren't inflation-adjusted, BTW. So after adjusting for inflation, people bought a lot less stuff
CPI month-over-month: December: +0.3%, January: +0.2% -- https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0
So December was about 0.0 - 0.3 = 0.3% less stuff
and January was about -0.2 - 0.2 = 0.4% less stuff
# CBO's annual report on Social Security
Social Security benefits predicted to run out earlier than expected: Report, Newsweek, 3/6/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/social-security-benefits-predicted-to-run-out-earlier-than-expected-report/ar-AA1XGLdH
CBO says the OASI trust fund (OASI = Old-Age and Survivors Insurance) is expected to run out in 2032, a year earlier than previously projected, due to higher inflation and lower payroll tax revenues than projected in last year's report. Once reserves are exhausted, SSA would likely only be able to pay about 80 percent of promised benefits, barring congressional intervention.
The article doesn't say a word about the DI (Disability Insurance) trust fund or OASDI. The Social Security Trustees, in their annual reports, combines the OASI and DI trust funds into a hypothetical OASDI trust fund for purposes of calculating an insolvency date (because they have in the past borrowed from each other and would be expected to do so again). The trustees' 2026 report is expected in April, May, or June (when they put out the report has been erratic for many years).
THURSDAY MARCH 5 (Reports)
# Initial jobless claims week ending Feb. 28
US jobless claims filings unchanged from previous week at 213,000 as layoffs remain low, AP,
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-jobless-claims-filings-unchanged-from-previous-week-at-213-000-as-layoffs-remain-low/ar-AA1XAxBu
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
This report's permalink: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260226
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
* The source URL has graphs, so one can see the trend over a year
# Productivity, Q4, 1st estimate, Commerce Department
These are quarterly numbers at an annualized rate. This follows a big dip in GDP between Q3 (4.4%) and Q4 1st estimate (1.4%).
Q4 nonfarm productivity: +2.8% Q/Q vs. +1.9% consensus and +5.2% prior (revised from +4.9%), according to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Thursday.
Unit labor costs: +2.8% Q/Q vs. +2.1% consensus and -1.8% prior (revised from -1.9%).
Q4 productivity rises more than expected, labor costs jump past consensus,
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/q4-productivity-rises-more-than-expected-labor-costs-jump-past-consensus/ar-AA1XACjx
From the source: www.bls.gov/productivity
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/prod2_03052026.htm
Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2025,
reflecting a 5.7-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 2.8-percent increase in productivity ((these are seasonally adjusted annualized rates -progree)). Unit labor costs increased 1.3 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
reflecting a 5.7-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 2.8-percent increase in productivity ((these are seasonally adjusted annualized rates -progree)). Unit labor costs increased 1.3 percent over the last four quarters. (See tables A1 and 2.)
# Import price index, Feb.
# Challenger, Gray & Christmas on layoffs and hires
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143626940
Another: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/in-nice-reprieve-job-cut-announcements-declined-last-month-125204515.html
Job cuts announcements declined last month. A complex report.
WEDNESDAY MARCH 4 (Reports)
# ADP employment (private sector workforce) - February (non-govt.) ADP processes payrolls for 20% of the private sector payroll employed, and estimates somehow the other 80%. It's a non-governmental report, so the report's timing is not subject to the government shutdown/startup schedule.
ADP: Private Payrolls: February:: +63,000, (January was revised down from +22,000 to just +11,000)
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143626323
Another, Yahoo Finance:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/adp-private-employers-added-63000-jobs-in-february-the-best-monthly-showing-since-july-132604002.html
Another:- ADP jobs report shows white-collar losses in February. Quartz
ADP jobs report shows white-collar losses in February. Quartz
The ultimate source: https://adpemploymentreport.com/
Monthly, Not Seasonally Adjusted
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERNSA
Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA
# S&P final U.S. services PMI Feb.
# ISM services Feb.
# Federal Reserve's Beige Book
Fed's Beige Book paints mixed picture of economy as hiring remains flat and tariffs raise costs, Yahoo Finance, 3/4/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/feds-beige-book-paints-mixed-picture-of-economy-as-hiring-remains-flat-and-tariffs-raise-costs-202936510.html
US economy got off to a choppy start in 2026, the Fed finds. Heres the good and bad news., MarketWatch, 3/4/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-economy-got-off-to-a-choppy-start-in-2026-the-fed-finds-here-s-the-good-and-bad-news/ar-AA1Xx985
TUESDAY MARCH 3 (Reports)
Nothing. The ADP Pulse report on private payrolls that normally comes out every Tuesday will not come out today becase the monthly national employment report comes out this week (Wednesday).
MONDAY MARCH 2 (Reports)
# S&P final U.S. manufacturing PMI Feb.
# ISM manufacturing Feb
FRIDAY FEB 27 (REPORTS)
# PPI Producer Price Index aka wholesale prices, January -
# PPI January:+0.5% (Nov:+0.2%, Dec:+0.4%), 12 months: +2.8% all seasonally-adjusted
. . .(the 12-month is +2.9% in not-seasonally-adjusted data which for some reason the BLS highlights for 12-month numbers),
# PPI ex food, energy, and trade services - what the BLS considers core PPI although they never use the term "core" ): January: +0.3%, 12 months +3.4%
# PPI ex food and energy: January: +0.8%, 12 months: +3.6%
# LBN THREAD: democraticunderground.com/10143622956
. . . referring to https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/27/ppi-january-2026-.html
# BLS SOURCE: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
# PPI http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD4
# PPI ex food, energy, and trade services http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD49116
# PPI ex food & energy http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD49104
# Note that the BLS never uses the term "core" anywhere in the news release ppi.nr0.htm
# CNBC story (URL above): "Trade services prices surged 2.5%, helping boost pressures on wholesale inflation."
# See also Table A in ppi.nr0.htm: Trade Services month-over-month percentage increases in the last 6 months were:
. . . -2.1%, +1.6%, -0.9%, -0.5%, +1.8%, +2.5%
# AP story == https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-wholesale-prices-arrive-hotter-133757417.html
Driving the increase ((in PPI and PPI ex food and energy -progree)) was an uptick in the wholesale price of services ((this is the trade services thing --progree)), led by higher profit margins for retailers and wholesalers. The increase suggests that companies are passing along the cost of President Donald Trump's tariffs to their customers.
Energy prices were down as gasoline prices dropped 5.5% from December and 15.7% from a year earlier. Wholesale food prices also fell.
Energy prices were down as gasoline prices dropped 5.5% from December and 15.7% from a year earlier. Wholesale food prices also fell.
# MarketWatch == https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/wholesale-prices-rise-sharply-and-point-to-persistent-inflation/ar-AA1Xd1r3
The Marketwatch story exclusively uses the PPI and the PPI without food, energy, and trade services, and -- following BLS practice -- does not mention at all a PPI without food and energy. They say that the trade margin category "is not a reliable measure of prices"
Below are the annualized numbers so they can be compared to the Fed's 2.0% target:
1 mo 3 mo 12 mo
5.9% 4.7% 2.8% PPI
3.8% 3.4% 3.4% PPI ex Food, Energy, & Trade Services
2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Fed Target
There is a PPI ex food and energy that the media calls "core" (the BLS doesn't use the term "core" anywhere in their news release ppi.nr0.htm, or anywhere else that I know of)
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD49104
1 mo 3 mo 12 mo
10.0% 6.1% 3.6% PPI ex Food & Energy - the BLS does not even show this in ppi.nr0.htm
I use the one that is PPI ex food, energy, and trade services because that is the one the BLS highlights (and did so in the pre-Trump past too, so it's not a conniving Krasnov thing). And for consistency with my previous reports -- Trade services, which is wholesaler's margin, is very volatile from month to month (see above where, from Table A, I display the last 6 months, month-by-month). The idea of core prices is to remove the most volatile components so that it's a better predictor of FUTURE inflation, and that's why the BLS does and did highlight the w/o food, energy, and trade services version. In this month (January) Trade Services is the main engine driving the PPI;s extraordinary monthly growth, and even more so that of the PPI ex food, energy..
The rolling 3 month average of the PPI ex food, energy, and trade services has been trending down from a recent peak of 5.1% in September, to 3.4% in January.(annualized)
But I showed PPI ex Food, Energy above as a line below my usual table because the media is making an enormous hoo hah about it, particularly the 0.8% January over December increase (which annualizes to 10.0%)..
Still, the PPI ex Food, Energy, Trade Services is well above 3% annualized in the 1 month (3.8%), 3 month (3.4%), and 12 month (3.4%) averages..
THURSDAY FEB 26 (REPORTS)
# Unemployment insurance claims
US filings for jobless aid rise modestly to 212,000 as layoffs remain at historically healthy levels, AP, 2/26/25
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-filings-for-jobless-aid-rise-modestly-to-212-000-as-layoffs-remain-at-historically-healthy-levels/ar-AA1X8f5z
The number of Americans filing for jobless aid for the week ending Feb. 21 rose by 4,000 to 212,000 from the previous week
. . .The Labor Departments report Thursday showed that the four-week moving average of jobless claims, which balances some of the week-to-week volatility, ticked up by 750 to 220,250.
The total number of Americans filing for jobless benefits for the previous week ending Feb. 14 fell by 31,000 to 1.83 million, the government said ((this is also widely known as "continuing claims", and what the Dept of Labor calls "insured unemployment" in its report -progree)).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-filings-for-jobless-aid-rise-modestly-to-212-000-as-layoffs-remain-at-historically-healthy-levels/ar-AA1X8f5z
The number of Americans filing for jobless aid for the week ending Feb. 21 rose by 4,000 to 212,000 from the previous week
. . .The Labor Departments report Thursday showed that the four-week moving average of jobless claims, which balances some of the week-to-week volatility, ticked up by 750 to 220,250.
The total number of Americans filing for jobless benefits for the previous week ending Feb. 14 fell by 31,000 to 1.83 million, the government said ((this is also widely known as "continuing claims", and what the Dept of Labor calls "insured unemployment" in its report -progree)).
The article also summarizes some recent jobs reports
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
This report's permalink: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260226
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
* The source URL has graphs, so one can see the trend over a year
WEDNESDAY FEB 25 (REPORTS)
# Nvidia's Earnings report - I've never made a Calendar item out of a single stock's report, but while I was doing Tuesday's update, I kept reading comments about how it is a really big deal and a test of AI's financial strength and market sentiment around AI... well here it is:
Nvidias blowout earnings report disappoints Wall Street as stock sinks 5%, CNBC, 2/25/26
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/nvidia-nvda-stock-price-q4-earnings.html
TUESDAY FEB 24 (REPORTS)
# ADP NER Pulse private payrolls weekly estimate - For the four weeks ending February 7, 2026, private employers added an average of 12,750 jobs a week. It was the fourth straight week of strengthening job gains.
SOURCE: https://www.adpresearch.com/ and search for Pulse
https://www.adpresearch.com/what-happened-to-labor-market-dynamism/ search for "NER Pulse" to see the graph
GRAPH:

Multiplying by 365 / (12*7) to "monthesize it" to the average month: 55,400
Compare to latest from BLS: 172,000 PRIVATE SECTOR jobs added in January
. . . https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm
Economy Group Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/1116101728
# S&P Case-Shiller home price index (20 cities), December
Up 1.4%, same as November, which was also up 1.4%.
# Consumer confidence, February
91.2. 88.6 was expected. Previous time: 89.0.
From the source: https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence/
The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index® increased by 2.2 points in February to 91.2 (1985=100), from an upwardly revised 89.0 in January. The Present Situation Indexbased on consumers assessment of current business and labor market conditionsdecreased by 1.8 points to 120.0 in February. The Expectations Indexbased on consumers short-term outlook for income, business, and labor market conditionsrose by 4.8 points to 72.0. The cutoff for preliminary results was February 17, 2026.
For graphs, click above link -- the uptick is almost imperceptible. It remains at about the same level as it averaged in the first 9 months of the pandemic

MONDAY FEB 23 (REPORTS)
# Factory orders December
-0.7%. ; +0.2% expected. ; Previous time: +2.7%. Year-over-year: +3.7%
US factory orders fall in December on commercial aircraft bookings, Reuters, 2/23/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-factory-orders-fall-december-154841615.html
New orders for U.S. factory goods fell in December amid a sharp decline in commercial aircraft bookings, but demand elsewhere was strong, partly driven by robust investment in artificial intelligence.
Factory orders dropped 0.7% after an unrevised 2.7% increase in November, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau said on Monday.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast factory orders would slip 0.6%. Orders advanced 3.7% on a year-on-year basis in December. The report was delayed by last year's government shutdown,
. . . Manufacturing, which accounts for 10.1% of the economy, has been hamstrung by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, which business leaders say have raised costs for factories and consumers. But some sections have been supported by the rapid adoption of AI.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-factory-orders-fall-december-154841615.html
New orders for U.S. factory goods fell in December amid a sharp decline in commercial aircraft bookings, but demand elsewhere was strong, partly driven by robust investment in artificial intelligence.
Factory orders dropped 0.7% after an unrevised 2.7% increase in November, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau said on Monday.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast factory orders would slip 0.6%. Orders advanced 3.7% on a year-on-year basis in December. The report was delayed by last year's government shutdown,
. . . Manufacturing, which accounts for 10.1% of the economy, has been hamstrung by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, which business leaders say have raised costs for factories and consumers. But some sections have been supported by the rapid adoption of AI.
FRIDAY FEB 20
# GDP Q4 FIRST ESTIMATE
2.5% annualized growth expected, 1.4% is what happened according to the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Q3 was 4.4% annualized rate (I know I know, but the AI spending counts as GDP, even if it produces nothing useful)
Yes, the reported GDP numbers are inflation-adjusted
Full year GDP's: 2024: 2.8%. 2025: 2.2%
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143619093
ULTIMATE SOURCE:
. . . https://bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product
. . . https://bea.gov/news/current-releases
. . . https://bea.gov/news/2026/gdp-advance-estimate-4th-quarter-and-year-2025
Analysis: These two new economic numbers blew a hole in Trumps rosy narrative, CNN, 2/21/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/analysis-these-two-new-economic-numbers-blew-a-hole-in-trump-s-rosy-narrative/ar-AA1WNbxe
#1 Trade balance, #2 GDP growth (see Thursday on trade balance)
# PCE Inflation for December - Fed's favorite inflation gauge
Expected: month-over-month: 0.3%, year-over-year: 2.8% (both numbers same as November's)
What happened: month-over-month: regular PCE (includes food and energy) +0.4%
Core PCE (doesn't include food or energy): +0.4%
12 month average (year-over-year): regular PCE: +2.9%, core PCE: +3.0%
LBN thread (this leads off with the GDP, but also includes PCE inflation): https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143619093
GRAPHS: rolling averages of 3 months and 12 months. And month-over-month bar chart. Both regular and core:
. . . https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3619273
This inflation gauge fully includes substitution effects, so for example if beef prices are way up and a lot of consumers switch to turkey necks, this inflation gauge will show a subdued rise or even a drop in the meat price index. But I suspect the Fed likes it because it tends to produce a lower inflation rate than the CPI.
* SOURCE URLS:: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE: https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-december-2025
. . . Full Release and Tables: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-02/pi1225.pdf
. . . PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEPI
. . . CORE PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/PCEPILFE
# Personal Income and Spending for December
* SOURCE URLS:: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE: https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-december-2025
. . . Full Release and Tables: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-02/pi1225.pdf
# S&P flash U.S. services PMI for February
# S&P flash U.S. manufacturing PMI for February
# New home sales for November and December
# Consumer sentiment (prelim) for February
Consumer sentiment in February shows high prices weigh on US households, but Supreme Court could offer relief, Yahoo Finance, 2/20/26 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/consumer-sentiment-in-february-shows-high-prices-weigh-on-us-households-but-supreme-court-could-offer-relief-161122277.html
The University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment for February came in at 56.6, up 0.4% from January, but below last year's level of 64.7. The small increase was lower than the 57.2 reading expected by economists. (Be sure to look at the graph that shows the scale of the teeny tiny up-tick still leaving it at incredibly low levels historically.
ULTIMATE SOURCE: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/
GRAPH, 10 years: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsr.pdf
GRAPH, 50 years: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsh.pdf
THURSDAY FEB 19
# Leading economic index for December Conference Board (non-governmental)
US leading indicators forecast slow start to 2026, Wall St. Journal via MSN (no paywall), 2/17/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-leading-indicators-forecast-slow-start-to-2026/ar-AA1WG60g
ULTIMATE SOURCE: https://www.conference-board.org/topics/us-leading-indicators/index.cfm
# Unemployment insurance claims
US weekly jobless claims fall more than expected amid labor market stability (dropped 23k to 206k in week ending Feb 14 ## Continuing claims week ending Feb 7 ROSE 17k to 1.869 M), Reuters, 2/19/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-weekly-jobless-claims-fall-134542016.html
. . .continuing claims suggested that laid-off workers were experiencing difficulties finding new positions.
The median duration of unemployment is near four-year highs. The lack of hiring has significantly impacted recent college graduates, who because of no or limited work history, cannot file for unemployment benefits and are not captured in the claims data.
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
This report's permalink: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260219
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
# U.S. trade deficit for December (the Commerce Dept)
U.S. trade deficit slipped to $901 billion last year amid Trump tariffs, AP, 2/19/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-trade-deficit-slipped-901-134134850.html
From $904 billion in 2024 to $901 B in 2025.
The trade gap surged from January-March as U.S. companies tried to import foreign goods ahead of Trumps taxes, then narrowed most of the rest of the year.
Analysis: These two new economic numbers blew a hole in Trumps rosy narrative, CNN, 2/21/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/analysis-these-two-new-economic-numbers-blew-a-hole-in-trump-s-rosy-narrative/ar-AA1WNbxe
#1 Trade balance, #2 GDP growth (see Friday on GDP)
# Advanced U.S. trade balance in goods for December
See above AP story
# Mortgages rates
Mortgage rates drop to lowest level in nearly 4 years
https://finance.yahoo.com/personal-finance/mortgages/article/mortgage-rates-drop-to-lowest-level-in-nearly-4-years-110045487.html
WEDNESDAY FEB 18
# Housing Starts for November and December
Housing starts jump to 5-month high in December
Go to Stock Market Today https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-gain-for-3rd-straight-day-nasdaq-jumps-as-traders-brush-aside-ai-worries-210052721.html
and scroll down the page quite a ways, or search the page for "housing starts"
Yes, I wish Yahoo would give these articles their own URL.
The number of new single-family homes under construction in December hit an annualized rate of 1.4 million homes, up 6.2% from November and ahead of forecasts for an annualized rate of 1.32 million homes, according to data from the Census Bureau. This pace of building, however, is still 7.3% below December 2024.
This report followed Tuesday's read on homebuilder confidence from the NAHB, which showed sentiment fell by another point to 36 this month, the lowest reading since September.
This report followed Tuesday's read on homebuilder confidence from the NAHB, which showed sentiment fell by another point to 36 this month, the lowest reading since September.
**FRED graph shown in the article, graph is titled: "New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started, Total Units" from 2016 onward
# Building Permits for November and December
December was 1.32 million vs. 1.31 million expected and 1.27 million previously, according to https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendar
# Durable Goods Orders for December
Durable goods orders were down 1.4% in December vs. down 2.0% expected, and +5.4% previously according to https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendar . I believe these are seasonally adjusted. I don't have an explanation, I haven't looked for an article.
# Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization for January
Go to Stock Market Today https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-gain-for-3rd-straight-day-nasdaq-jumps-as-traders-brush-aside-ai-worries-210052721.html
and scroll down the page quite a ways, or search the page for "industrial production"
Yes, I wish Yahoo would give these articles their own URL.
US industrial production grew in January by widest monthly margin since March 2025 (+0.7%. It was the largest month-on-month percentage increase since March 2025,
Compared to a year ago, industrial production and manufacturing activity were up 2.3% and 2.4%.
# Minutes of Fed's January FOMC meeting
TUESDAY FEB 17
Nothing
MONDAY FEB 16
None scheduled, President's Day holiday
FRIDAY FEB 13
# Consumer price index Jan.
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143615668
A lot of response from the Krasnov Krasnov! Brigade. But they were eerily absent when the latest PPI (Producer Price Index, aka Wholesale Prices) report reported a 0.5% increase in December (that's a 6.0% annualized rate), and 3.0% over the past 12 months (their core measure was 3.5% over the past 12 months) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143608234 (see Reply #1 for more on that 1/30/26 report with the title, "Wholesale prices rise sharply and show new Fed chief could confront stubborn inflation" )
Back to CPI - here's the core part of it, which is considered by the Federal Reserve as more representative of underlying trends and more predictive of FUTURE inflation - assertions that have been back-tested. This one is a rolling 3 month average, so that it's more than a "One off" of the latest month, but with much more recency than year-over-year. It shows a distinctive up-turn

The regular CPI's 3 month rolling average also has risen the last 2 months in a row, although not as sharply. So much for "cooling inflation" I guess.
Chicago Fed's Goolsbee says interest rates could fall 'a fair bit more,' but more inflation progress is needed, Yahoo Finance, 2/13/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chicago-feds-goolsbee-says-interest-rates-could-fall-a-fair-bit-more-but-more-inflation-progress-is-needed-210239035.html
He is concerned about services inflation which tends to be persistent and not driven by tariffs (so an easing of tariffs isn't going to help much with services inflation, and if the impact of tariffs is a one-time thing, as many think, that's not going to help with services inflation. Says inflation has been above the target for more than 4.5 years now)
THURSDAY FEB 12
# Unemployment insurance claims
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf
This report's permalink: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260212
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
In the week ending February 7, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 227,000, a decrease of 5,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 1,000 from 231,000 to 232,000.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment ((also known as continuing claims -progree)) during the week ending January 31 was 1,862,000, an increase of 21,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised down by 3,000 from 1,844,000 to 1,841,000.
...
The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment ((also known as continuing claims -progree)) during the week ending January 31 was 1,862,000, an increase of 21,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised down by 3,000 from 1,844,000 to 1,841,000.
# Existing home sales Jan.
Realtors report a new housing crisis as January home sales tank more than 8%, CNBC, 2/12/26
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/january-homes-sales.html
. . . The chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, Lawrence Yun, is calling it a new housing crisis.
Sales of previously owned homes in January dropped a much wider-than-expected 8.4% from December to a seasonally adjusted, annualized rate of 3.91 million, according to the NAR. Sales were 4.4% lower than January 2025. That is the slowest pace since December 2023 and the biggest monthly drop since February 2022. The median price for a home sold in January was $396,800, up 0.9% year over year and the highest January price on record.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/january-homes-sales.html
. . . The chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, Lawrence Yun, is calling it a new housing crisis.
Sales of previously owned homes in January dropped a much wider-than-expected 8.4% from December to a seasonally adjusted, annualized rate of 3.91 million, according to the NAR. Sales were 4.4% lower than January 2025. That is the slowest pace since December 2023 and the biggest monthly drop since February 2022. The median price for a home sold in January was $396,800, up 0.9% year over year and the highest January price on record.
WEDNESDAY FEB 11
# The big "First Friday" monthly BLS jobs report that produces the headline non-farm payroll jobs number and unemployment rate - January
Ultimate source of the latest release: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Permanent copy of this January report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02112026.htm
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614651
The before and after the big jobs revisions, month by month:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3615236
Here's a summary table showing the annual totals:
Annual Totals, in thousands
Year Before After Difference
2022] 4555 4526 -29
2023] 2594 2515 -79
2024] 2012 1459 -553
2025] 584 181 -403
2025 comes out to an average of 15k jobs/month. If you remove January, it is 21k/month. A barely above-the-waterline record.
And yet most media headlines are about a big surge in jobs (130,000) in January. 130,000 is not a big number, but relatively speaking it's a "surge" compared to the pathetic average monthly jobs growth in 2025.
The unemployment rate (from a separate survey, the Household Survey) fell from 4.4% to 4.3% (It was 4.0% in January 2025, a year ago)
The Household Survey's "Employed" number increased by just 689,000 since January 2025 ( 57,000 / month average ).
Increase in private sector payroll jobs (for comparison to ADP): +172k
TUESDAY FEB 10
# NFIB optimism index, January
US small-business confidence slipped in January, Wall St. Journal, 2/10/26 (no paywall or gimmicks at this MSN-hosted article)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/smallbusiness/us-small-business-confidence-slipped-in-january/ar-AA1W33sy
# US consumer delinquencies jump to highest in almost a decade, Bloomberg, 2/10/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-consumer-delinquencies-jump-to-highest-in-almost-a-decade/ar-AA1W4vwC
I haven't had time to read this article, but title is sure gloomy.
# Employment Cost index, Q4 - Considered the best statistic on wages/salaries and benefits, and the Federal Reserve's favorite source on the same.
Economy Group post: https://www.democraticunderground.com/1116101681
From the source: https://www.bls.gov/eci/
Some context:
The ECI shows changes in wages and benefits in a manner that fixes the composition of the workforce. This is important, particularly when there are large changes in employment, because these data are not subject to the same distortions as the monthly average hourly earnings series, which can artificially be increased when low-wage workers lose their jobs and drop out of the sample (as happened in 2020) or artificially be decreased when these same workers are hired back (as happened in 2021) [1].
By fixing workforce composition, the ECI provides a more accurate picture of what is actually happening to wages.
By fixing workforce composition, the ECI provides a more accurate picture of what is actually happening to wages.
[1] The Pandemics Effect on Measured Wage Growth, The WHite House, 4/19/21 ((Biden era))
. . . Original link now gone, thanks to Krasnov: https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/04/19/the-pandemics-effect-on-measured-wage-growth/
. . . The Archive.org link: https://web.archive.org/web/20220208080743/https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/04/19/the-pandemics-effect-on-measured-wage-growth/
# Import price index
This is another one I don't have time to look into now
# Retail sales - caution: not inflation-adjusted, so one gets a distorted view of increases in retail sales, when often most of that is simply due to price increases. It is seasonally adjusted.
RETAIL SALES DECEMBER over November: +0.0%, Inflation was 0.31%, so inflation-adjusted retail sales were down about 0.3% for the month
RETAIL SALES for the 12 month period through December (i.e. year-over-year): +2.4%, Inflation: +2.7%, so inflation-adjusted retail sales were down about 0.3% for the 12-month period
LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614155
From the Source: https://www.census.gov/retail/index.html -- > https://www.census.gov/retail/sales.html :
Remember the below numbers are not inflation adjusted
. . . [] Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USN), Not Seasonally Adjusted: +10.9% == https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USN
. . . [] Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USS), Seasonally Adjusted: +-0.0% == https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USS
And so the seasonal adjustment process turned a 10.9% increase to 0.0% in December (remember it's the Christmas month ho ho ho)
CPI inflation: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0
MONDAY FEB 09
Nothing
FRIDAY FEB 06
# Consumer sentiment (preliminary) - February
Consumer sentiment hits highest level since August, but is down 11% from year ago
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/consumer-sentiment-hits-highest-level-since-august-but-down-11-from-year-ago-as-inflation-job-worries-weigh-155341347.html
SOURCE: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/
GRAPH, 10 years: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsr.pdf
GRAPH, 50 years: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsh.pdf
It's definitely an uptick, but a very small uptick. It's at about the lowest point seen in the post-pandemic 2022 inflation peak, and definitely below the worst levels of the housing bubble and dot-com crashes.
"While sentiment is currently the highest since August 2025, recent monthly increases have been small well under the margin of error and the overall level of sentiment remains very low from a historical perspective. Concerns about the erosion of personal finances from high prices and elevated risk of job loss continue to be widespread," University of Michigan surveys of consumers director Joanne Hsu said in the release.
. . .
Friday's reading from the University of Michigan also showed a divergence based on exposure to the stock market, though the report noted responses to this survey were collected prior to the onset of the software-led tech sell-off that started earlier this week.
"Sentiment surged for consumers with the largest stock portfolios, while it stagnated and remained at dismal levels for consumers without stock holdings," Hsu said.
. . .
Friday's reading from the University of Michigan also showed a divergence based on exposure to the stock market, though the report noted responses to this survey were collected prior to the onset of the software-led tech sell-off that started earlier this week.
"Sentiment surged for consumers with the largest stock portfolios, while it stagnated and remained at dismal levels for consumers without stock holdings," Hsu said.
THURSDAY FEB 05
# JOLTS - Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey - December -
Job openings sink in December to lowest level since 2020
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/job-openings-sink-in-december-to-lowest-level-since-2020-151605057.html
. . . showed there were 6.5 million jobs open at the end of December. Economists polled by Bloomberg had projected 7.25 million openings for the month.
Layoffs and discharges, at 1.8 million, increased slightly from 1.7 million a month earlier.
The hiring rate, meanwhile, improved slightly from a month prior, reaching 3.3%. The quits rate, often seen as a barometer of workers' confidence to jump from their current post to search for greener pastures, also remained at 2%.
Layoffs and discharges, at 1.8 million, increased slightly from 1.7 million a month earlier.
The hiring rate, meanwhile, improved slightly from a month prior, reaching 3.3%. The quits rate, often seen as a barometer of workers' confidence to jump from their current post to search for greener pastures, also remained at 2%.
# Unemployment insurance claims
US weekly jobless claims rise by more than expected
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-sell-off-builds-as-tech-rout-continues-bitcoin-plunges-210019775.html
(and scroll way down)
Jobless claims for the week ending Jan. 31 increased by 22,000 to 231,000 claims, exceeding economists' forecasts, the Labor Department reported Thursday.
Continuing claims, a proxy for the total number of people receiving state unemployment benefits, increased to 1.84 million.
Continuing claims, a proxy for the total number of people receiving state unemployment benefits, increased to 1.84 million.
More on continuing claims for the week ending January 24 was 1,844,000, an increase of 25,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised down by 8,000 from 1,827,000 to 1,819,000.
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf . . . this release's permalink is at https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260205
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
WEDNESDAY FEB 04
# ADP employment (private sector workforce) - January. ADP processes payrolls for 20% of the private sector payroll employed, and estimates somehow the other 80%. It's a non-governmental report, so the report's timing is not subject to the government shutdown/startup schedule.
Private payrolls rose by just 22,000 in January, far short of expectations, ADP says, CNBC, 2/4/26
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143611175
The total was less than the downwardly revised 37,000 increase in December and below the Dow Jones consensus forecast for 45,000.
The ultimate source: https://adpemploymentreport.com/
Seasonal adjustment turned a 2.171 Million job loss into a 22,000 gain - details: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143611175#post15
Monthly, Not Seasonally Adjusted
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERNSA
Monthly, Seasonally Adjusted:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ADPMNUSNERSA
TUESDAY FEB 03
# ISM Services - January
MONDAY FEB 02
# ISM manufacturing - January -
FRIDAY JAN 30
# PPI Producer price index (aka wholesale prices) (delayed report) DECEMBER
REGULAR PPI: DECEMBER: +0.5% (Oct: +0.1%, Nov: +0.2%), 12 months: +3.0%
CORE PPI (ex food, energy, trade services): DECEMBER: +0.4%, 12 months: +3.5%
LBN THREAD: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143608234
BLS SOURCE: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
a 0.7-percent advance in the index for final demand services. Prices for final demand goods were unchanged
2/3 of the broad-based December rise in prices for final demand services can be traced to a 1.7-percent jump in margins for final demand trade services. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
2/3 of the broad-based December rise in prices for final demand services can be traced to a 1.7-percent jump in margins for final demand trade services. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
----- Data Series ----
PPI http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD4
Core PPI http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD49116 (wo food, energy, trade services)
The actual one month numbers (December over November) to 2-digit accuracy: PPI: +0.50%, Core PPI: +0.36%. When annualized, they are 6.0% and 4.4% respectively.
Below are the annualized numbers so they can be compared to the Fed's 2.0% target:
1 mo 3 mo 12 mo
6.0% 3.3% 3.0% PPI
4.4% 5.1% 3.5% CORE PPI = PPI ex Food, Energy, Trade Services
2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Fed Target
There is also a core PPI data series where core is defined as the PPI ex food and energy
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/WPSFD49104
I use the one that is PPI ex food, energy, and trade services because that is the one the BLS highlights (and did so in the pre-Trump past too, so it's not a conniving Krasnov thing). Trade services, which is the wholesaler's margin, is very volatile from month to month.
THURSDAY JAN 29
# Unemployment insurance claims
Week ending Jan 24 -1,000 to 209,000, 205,000 expected, (Not seasonally adjusted: 231,181)
Continuing Claims, week ending Jan 17: -38k to 1.827M
https://apnews.com/article/unemployment-benefits-jobless-claims-layoffs-labor-21ccf4e6ebbcabbc424e2feb56f0fee7
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf . . . this release's permalink is at https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260129
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
# U.S. trade deficit (delayed report) NOVEMBER
US trade deficit widens by the most in nearly 34 years in November, Reuters, 1/29/28
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-trade-deficit-widens-most-144236696.html
* DU LBN THREAD (also of Reuters article) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143607655
The U.S. trade deficit widened by the most in nearly 34 years in November amid a surge in capital goods imports, likely driven by an artificial intelligence investment boom, which could prompt economists to trim their economic growth estimates for the fourth quarter.
The trade gap increased 94.6% to $56.8 billion, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau said on Thursday. The percentage change was the largest since March 1992. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the trade deficit would rise to $40.5 billion.
MORE ---
The deterioration in the trade deficit in November could temper economists' expectations that trade will deliver another large boost to gross domestic product in the fourth quarter.
Trade contributed to GDP growth in the second and third quarters of 2025.
The Atlanta Federal Reserve is forecasting that GDP increased at a 5.4% annualized rate in the fourth quarter, though estimates from big Wall Street banks, including Goldman Sachs, are running well below a 3.0% pace.
The trade gap increased 94.6% to $56.8 billion, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau said on Thursday. The percentage change was the largest since March 1992. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the trade deficit would rise to $40.5 billion.
MORE ---
The deterioration in the trade deficit in November could temper economists' expectations that trade will deliver another large boost to gross domestic product in the fourth quarter.
Trade contributed to GDP growth in the second and third quarters of 2025.
The Atlanta Federal Reserve is forecasting that GDP increased at a 5.4% annualized rate in the fourth quarter, though estimates from big Wall Street banks, including Goldman Sachs, are running well below a 3.0% pace.
* The U.S. trade deficit isnt actually falling due to tariffs. Its still near a record high, MarketWatch 1/29/26
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fools-gold-the-u-s-trade-deficit-isnt-actually-falling-due-to-tariffs-its-still-near-a-record-high-17412f1b
The trade deficit fell a few months ago to a 16-year low, but it was fools gold. The U.S. is still running a trade gap near historically high levels.
In November, the deficit almost doubled to $56.8 billion from just $29.2 billion in October.
The October deficit was the lowest since 2009 and was almost entirely the result of disrupted trade patterns tied to higher U.S. tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.
More...
The U.S. trade deficit totaled $839.5 billion through the first 11 months of 2025, compared with $806.5 billion in the same period in 2024.
For all of 20215, the U.S. is on track to post the second- or third-largest trade deficit ever.
In November, the deficit almost doubled to $56.8 billion from just $29.2 billion in October.
The October deficit was the lowest since 2009 and was almost entirely the result of disrupted trade patterns tied to higher U.S. tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.
More...
The U.S. trade deficit totaled $839.5 billion through the first 11 months of 2025, compared with $806.5 billion in the same period in 2024.
For all of 20215, the U.S. is on track to post the second- or third-largest trade deficit ever.
# U.S. productivity (revised) Q3 (was 4.9% in the initial report)
# Wholesale inventories (delayed report) NOVEMBER
# Factory orders (delayed report) NOVEMBER
WEDNESDAY JAN 28
# FOMC interest-rate decision and Powell press conference (2:00 P.M. and 2:30 P.M. ET respectively)
As expected, they kept the interest rate unchanged. There were 2 dissents, both wanting a rate reduction. I haven't looked or seen any jibber jabber about how many rate reductions are expected in 2026.
TUESDAY JAN 27
# Consumer confidence, Conference Board, January
Americans' confidence in the U.S. economy falls sharply in January to lowest level since 2014, AP, 1/27/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/americans-confidence-u-economy-falls-151544532.html
below even the lowest level of the pandemic
DU LBN Thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143606137
From the source: https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence/
For graphs, click above link, or the DU LBN thread link
MONDAY JAN 26
# Durable-goods orders, NOVEMBER (delayed report)
Durable goods jump more than expected in November, 1/26/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/durable-goods-jump-more-than-expected-in-november/ar-AA1V0fWT
FRIDAY JAN 23
# Consumer sentiment (final) January
Consumer sentiment remains depressed in January as higher costs, weakening labor market weigh on outlook, Yahoo Finance, 1/23/26 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/consumer-sentiment-remains-depressed-in-january-as-higher-costs-weakening-labor-market-weigh-on-outlook-154756985.html
. . . The University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment for January came in at 56.4, up 3.5 points from December but some 21% below last year's level of 71.7. (the previous preliminary data number was 54)
. . . Inflation expectations showed some signs of improvement, with year-ahead inflation forecasts falling to 4% from 4.2%. (from another article: five to ten year inflation expectations inched up to 3.3% from 3.2% last month.)
. . . Bloomberg - consumer sentiment is at a 5-month high == https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/us-consumer-sentiment-reaches-five-month-high-in-broad-gain/ar-AA1UPxug
. . . Progree - See 10 YEAR CHART - it barely caused the 3-month moving average to turn up just a bit, from a very low level
* SOURCE URL: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/
. . . 10 YEAR CHART: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsr.pdf
# S&P flash U.S. services PMI January
# S&P flash U.S. manufacturing PMI January
Economy shows signs of cooling, S&P finds. Tariffs still weigh on growth and hiring, MarketWatch, 1/23/26
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/economy-shows-signs-of-cooling-s-p-finds-tariffs-still-weigh-on-growth-and-hiring/ar-AA1UPu58
January PMI initial readings show 'sustained' but cooling economic growth, Yahoo Finance, 1/23/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-cap-volatile-week-with-back-to-back-weekly-losses-210233078.html
A preliminary reading on S&P Global's US Manufacturing PMI showed the activity-tracking index hitting 51.9 in January. That was slightly below the 52 expected by economists tracked by Bloomberg, but a hair above the 51.8 print last month.
Meanwhile, the US Services PMI was 52.5 in January (so far), also short of the 52.9 projected but unchanged from the previous month. A reading above 50 signals growth, while those below reflect contraction.
Similarly, the Composite PMI, which combines the manufacturing and services surveys, hit 52.8 this month. That was higher than December's 52.7 but beneath economists' consensus estimate of 53. ((13 year graph of Composite PMI shown -progree))
The PMI, or Purchasing Managers Index, measures the health of the manufacturing or services sector based on surveys of business leaders. Overall, the readings showed business activity was relatively unchanged in January from the previous month.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-cap-volatile-week-with-back-to-back-weekly-losses-210233078.html
A preliminary reading on S&P Global's US Manufacturing PMI showed the activity-tracking index hitting 51.9 in January. That was slightly below the 52 expected by economists tracked by Bloomberg, but a hair above the 51.8 print last month.
Meanwhile, the US Services PMI was 52.5 in January (so far), also short of the 52.9 projected but unchanged from the previous month. A reading above 50 signals growth, while those below reflect contraction.
Similarly, the Composite PMI, which combines the manufacturing and services surveys, hit 52.8 this month. That was higher than December's 52.7 but beneath economists' consensus estimate of 53. ((13 year graph of Composite PMI shown -progree))
The PMI, or Purchasing Managers Index, measures the health of the manufacturing or services sector based on surveys of business leaders. Overall, the readings showed business activity was relatively unchanged in January from the previous month.
THURSDAY JAN 22
# PCE inflation FOR NOVEMBER - the Fed's favorite inflation gauge. This is stale, considering that there are numbers out for both the December CPI and the December PPI (producer price index)
* LBN THREAD: Fed's main gauge shows inflation at 2.8% in November, edging further away from target, CNBC, 1/22/26 == https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143603115
* It was a combined October and November report. From a Yahoo article: "For portions of October lacking detailed information from the Consumer Price Index, which is used to calculate PCE, the BEA used an average of September and November figures."
* On a month-over-month basis, both November over October, and October over September came in at 0.2% -- that's true for both the headline number and the core number
* On a year-over-year basis, both the headline and the core numbers were 2.8%
* SOURCE URLS: 1/22/26 release: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE: https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-october-and-november-2025
. . . Full Release and Tables: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-01/pi10-1125.pdf
. . . PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEPI
. . . CORE PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/PCEPILFE
# GDP Q3 (first revision) - expected to be 4.3% annualized rate, same as the initial estimate. It turned out to be 4.4% annualized rate
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/consumer-spending-pushes-us-economy-133751928.html
. . . From the PCE article: The strength of the consumption data adds further weight to the idea that the economy might not need additional policy support, with real consumption rising by 0.3% in both months, noted Capital Economics economist Thomas Ryan.
# Personal spending and personal income for NOVEMBER -- see:
* SOURCE URLS: 1/22/26 release: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE: https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-october-and-november-2025
. . . Full Release and Tables: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-01/pi10-1125.pdf
# Unemployment insurance claims
. . . US applications for jobless benefits inch up last week to a still-low 200,000 (( +1,000 to 200,000, 207k expected, week ending Jan 17 # Continuing Claims, week ending Jan 10: -26k to 1.85M ) AP, 1/22/26 == https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-applications-jobless-benefits-inch-133912723.html
* SOURCE URL: The CURRENT one is always at: https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf . . . this release's permalink is at https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/eta/eta20260122
* Permalinks for the current one and recent previous ones: https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases
. . . and search the page for "Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report"
WEDNESDAY JAN 21
# Pending home sales US pending home sales plunge to five-month low in December, Reuters, 1/21/26
https://www.reuters.com/business/us-pending-home-sales-slump-five-month-low-december-2026-01-21/
Pending home sales index tumbles 9.3%, reverse gains notched since late summer
Spending on new single-family housing projects slumps 1.3% in October
TUESDAY JAN 20 - None scheduled
MONDAY JAN 19 - Martin Luther King Jr. Day, None scheduled
Friday Jan 16
# Industrial production and capacity utilization - US manufacturing output unexpectedly increases in December, Reuters, 1/16/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-december-industrial-production-rises-142129670.html
Thursday Jan 15
# Unemployment insurance claims
. Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims - Week Ending January 10: 198,000, down 9,000.
. . Note: Not Seasonally Adjusted: 330,684, Seasonally Adjusted: 198,000, quite a big seasonal adjustment
. Continuing Claims (week ending Jan 3): 1,884,000, down 19,000, 1/15/26
https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OPA/newsreleases/ui-claims/20260098.pdf
. Reuters - good article, they say the low seasonally adjusted initial claims level might be due to problem with seasonal adjustment. They also mention the NSA number above (330,684)
. . https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-weekly-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-fall-amid-seasonal-adjustment-challenges-2026-01-15/
# Import prices
# Empire state and Philadelphia Fed's manufacturing surveys
Wednesday Jan 14
# Retail sales for November (delayed report) (KEEP IN MIND THESE ARE NOT INFLATION-ADJUSTED but they are seasonally adjusted)
Numbers are the increase over the previous month unless specified otherwise e.g. "12 months" which is the 12 month average aka year-over-year
Retail sales rose a better-than-expected 0.6% in November, and rose 3.3% in the past 12 months through November (while inflation thru November was 2.7%, so retail sales gained only 0.6% over the 12 months in inflation-adjusted dollars), AP, 1/14/26 == https://finance.yahoo.com/news/retail-sales-rose-better-expected-134204407.html
(The previous 2 months were pathetic: September was +0.1% (while inflation was +0.3%), October was -0.1% (there are no month-to-month inflation numbers for October or November; again all of these are seasonally adjusted numbers, but not inflation-adjusted),
The MahatmaKaneJeeves LBN Thread: Wholesale inflation was softer than expected, RETAIL SALES moved higher in November, 1/14/26 == https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143598490
. . . [] From the Source: https://www.census.gov/retail/index.html -> https://www.census.gov/retail/sales.html :
. . . [] Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USN), Not Seasonally Adjusted: -0.8% == https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USN
. . . [] Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade and Food Services (MARTSMPCSM44X72USS), Seasonally Adjusted: +0.6% (September was +0.1%, October was -0.1%, ) == https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MARTSMPCSM44X72USS
. Very strange that in November, the seasonal adjustment process revised the November over October upward from -0.8% to +0.6%. October over September got seaonally revised downward from +4.9% to -0.1%
# PPI (Producer Price Index, aka Wholesale Prices) for November (delayed report)
Numbers are the increase over the previous month unless specified otherwise like "12 months" which is the 12 month average aka year-over-year
PPI for November +0.2% (Oct was +0.1%), 12 months: +3.0%
CORE PPI excluding food, energy and trade services: +0.2% (was +0.7% in October) 12 months: +3.5%, 1/14/26
Note that in November, for both the PPI and Core PPI, the 0.2% increase, when annualized is 2.4%, which exceeds the Fed's 2.0% target. And the year-over-year numbers (PPI: +3.0%, Core PPI: +3.5%) are well over the Fed's 2.0% target
. MahatmaKaneJeeves LBN Thread: Wholesale inflation was softer than expected, retail sales moved higher in November, 1/14/26 == https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143598490
. Ultimate Source: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
# Existing home sales (delayed report)
Tuesday Jan 13
# CPI Consumer Price Index - The headline (all items) number was as expected: December (over November): +0.3%, Year-over-year: +2.7%
The Core measure (which excludes food and energy) was a 0.1 percentage points below expectations: December (over November): +0.2%, Year-over-year: 2.6%. Note that the one-month numbers when annualized (3.6% and 2.4%) are over the Fed's 2.0% target, as are both year-over-year numbers.
The actual numbers calculated from the index values for more accuracy:
All items CPI: December (over November): +0.307% (which annualizes to 3.75%),
Core CPI: December (over November): +0.239% (which annualizes to 2.91%),
LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143597741
# New home sales
# Budget deficit
# NFIB optimism index
Monday Jan 12
# Nothing
FRIDAY, JANUARY 9
# Big BLS jobs report : +50,000 non-farm payroll jobs, unemployment rate ticked down from 4.5% to 4.4%. A LOT more to this story, for example, thanks to downward revisions of October and November, there are actually 26k fewer non-farm payroll jobs than were reported in the previous (December 16) report. AND , didya know, in December actual (meaning not-seasonally adjusted) jobs fell by 192,000, but seasonal adjustment turned that to a positive 50,000? Could YOU use a seasonal adjustment like that? AND, President literal asswipe posted several jobs numbers 12 hours before the 8:30 AM ET release time (did you know that they show the president and the entire Council of Economic Advisers the jobs report the evening before it is released?). AND there is probably a couple other things to say, I'll have to review the thread...
the LBN thread link, full of information, is https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143595598
# Consumer Sentiment - a slight improvement but graph still looks awful
https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/
GRAPH: https://www.sca.isr.umich.edu/files/chicsr.pdf
THURSDAY JANUARY 8
# Unemployment insurance claims: 208,000, an 8,000 increase over last week
# Q3 Productivity - I haven't looked at it, but from a headline I saw, it's a big jump thanks to the 4.3% Q3 GDP (annualized rate) reported in December,
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7
# ADP private payroll employment, +41,000 PRIVATE payroll jobs (by the way, in comparison the BLS jobs report that came out Friday 1/9, with the headline +50,000 jobs number, had a private payroll jobs increase of +37,000, a very unusally close match to the ADP number). (ADP has payroll data for about 20% of the private work force, and somehow they estimate the other 80%)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143594195
https://adpemploymentreport.com/
# ISM Services,
# JOLTS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, - kinda bad report. lowest job openings in over a year for one thing. The number of job openings fell in November, while the hiring rate was a paltry 3.2%. There were 1.1 unemployed people for every available job, the highest level since early 2021. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/layoff-plans-for-december-hit-lowest-monthly-level-since-2024-in-positive-sign-challenger-says-131808125.html (the article is almost all about the Challenger, Gray, and Christmas report, but the above blurb is in reference to the JOLTS report)
TUESDAY, JANUARY 6
* S&P Services PMI -- shows sector grew at slowest pace in 8 months in December
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-crosses-49000-sp-500-jumps-to-new-high-in-record-setting-start-to-year-194907643.html
(and scroll down that page)
MONDAY, JANUARY 5
* ISM Manufacturing -- US Factory Malaise Continues as Gauge Drops to One-Year Low, Bloomberg 1/5/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-factory-malaise-continues-gauge-152835595.html
head count shrinks for 11th straight month. (weren't tariffs supposed to fix that?)
FRIDAY, JANUARY 2
* S&P Manufacturing - I haven't seen the report
WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 31
* Weekly unemployment insurance claims, 199,000. It was 214,000 in last week's report
https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OPA/newsreleases/ui-claims/20251646.pdf
TUESDAY DECEMBER 30
* Case-Shiller home prices index - I saw a headline: home prices up for a 3rd straight month, and up 1.4% since October 2024
MONDAY DECEMBER 29
* Pending home sales - I saw a headline: up 3.35% from November and up 2.6% year-over-year (non-govt, National Association of Realtors)
WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 24
* Weekly unemployment insurance claims - 224,000 was reported December 18. 214,000 was reported today, December 24, a drop of 10,000 . But continuing claims rose by 38,000 to 1.92 million (govt)
TUESDAY DECEMBER 23
* GDP Q3 first estimate (delayed report, normally released late September). (govt) -- it came in at a 4.3% annualized rate, well above the 3.3% rate economists were expecting. Various factors cited in media: an acceleration of EV purchases prior to the Sept 30 expiration of tax credits. A lot of spending by big tech companies on AI (investment spending boosts the GDP number). A substantial rise in exports (up 8.8% annualized rate) and a small drop in imports -- both these boost the GDP number, Federal spending also played a sizable role, a reflection of the large uptick in defense spending as well as buyouts for federal workers. Also, it reflects the "K-shaped" economy -- higher-income people flush with growing stock market wealth increased their spending, while lesser-income people struggled with higher prices and a weakening job market.
LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143587157 ## From the source: https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-3rd-quarter-2025-initial-estimate-and-corporate-profits
* Consumer Confidence (Conference Board, non-govt) - result: the 5th straight month of decline. The worst since April, and at about the same level as seen in the 2020 pandemic year. Except there is no microbe-driven pandemic, it's all Trumpdemic now. Consumers assessments of their current economic situation tumbled 9.5 points to 116.8.
LBN thread (see graph in reply #2) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143587258
* Durable goods orders - I haven't looked at yet
* Industrial production and capacity utilization - I haven't looked at yet
FRIDAY DECEMBER 19
* Existing home sales (non-govt) - I haven't looked at yet
* Consumer Sentiment final (non-govt) - here's an article:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/consumer-sentiment-shows-substantial-decline-from-last-year-amid-higher-prices-tough-job-market-160618145.html
THUR DECEMBER 18:
* Weekly unemployment insurance claims for the week ending Dec 13 (it was 236,000 for the week ending Dec 6) - In the week ending December 13, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 224,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 1,000 from 236,000 to 237,000. (govt)
* Consumer price index for November (govt) (note: the one for October was cancelled. The November one was originally scheduled for December 10 before the Fed's rate-setting meeting, but alas was delayed until 8 days after the meeting) - result: 2.7% year-over-year, a cooling from the 3.0% year-over-year reported in the September report, and a 0.2% increase over the last 2 months. LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143584377
TUE DECEMBER 16:
* The long-delayed big Jobs report (featuring the headline non-farm payroll jobs and unemployment rate) (govt). Expected: +50,000 jobs in November and 4.5% unemployment rate. Actual: -105,000 in October and +64,000 in November for a net drop of jobs over these 2 months of 41,000. Nonfarm payroll jobs averaged only 17k/month over the last 7 months and 22k over the last 3 months. These are seasonally adjusted numbers. The raw numbers (i.e. not seasonally adjusted numbers) are 204k/month and 416k/month respectively. And the unemployment rate is 4.6% in November, up from 4.4% in September. LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143583215
There was not, and never will be a separate October jobs report. The payroll stuff Establishment survey was taken and will be included in the November report (as it was in the Decmber 16 report). The household survey that produces the unemployment rate was not done in October, and so the October unemployment rate will be a blank in the records forever.
More details: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143583215#post19
The LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143583215 .
Please disregard all the comments about "Christmas hires" and "seasonal hires" - those have been adjusted for.
TUE DECEMBER 16 Continued:
There's another jobs report that came out -- the ADP report on PRIVATE sector payrolls:
16,250 private jobs/week for 4 weeks ending 11/29/25 (so roughly +65,000 private sector jobs in the month of November)
LBN thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143583228
Again, ignore the comment about seasonal hiring. The ADP reports seasonally adjusted numbers
Also realize that The ADP numbers cover only about 20% of the nation's private workforce. They have to estimate the other 80%.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3506135
The retail sales report that came out December 16: Sept: +0.1% and October: +0.0%. Those are nominal dollar increases. After adjusting for inflation, which was 0.3% month-over-month in September, and an unknown amount in October, those are declines of real spending of 0.2% and 0.3%, assuming that October also comes in at 0.3% month-over-month inflation. Yes, they are seasonally adjusted.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/retail-sales-flat-in-october-as-uncertainty-tempers-consumer-spending/ar-AA1SsP9b
S&P flash U.S. services and manufacturing PMI's (non-govt) - I haven't looked at this yet
=================================================================
General Comments
Please don't believe the fabrication that Fed Chair Powell said, or implied, that the jobs numbers are "fudged". He did not. The person posting that claim included no excerpt that one can read to judge what exactly he said, and that was deliberate. When confronted, that person expressed some other reasons (again without supporting information) for believing the numbers are fudged. That may be so, But that does not excuse very deliberately misleading one's fellow progressives about what Powell said.
Please don't believe reports that 1 million or 1.1 million jobs were lost in 2025 so far, implying these are net job losses (jobs lost minus jobs gained). This is based on Challenger, Gray, and Christmas that reported 1,170,821 job cuts were ANNOUNCED. And they are just layoff announcements, and they are not net of hiring announcements or any actual hiring. As the monthly JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) shows, there are a lot of layoffs (and voluntary leavings of jobs) and a lot of hiring every month. The excuse that media misreports the Challenger report too is not an excuse for deliberately misleading one's fellow progressives, after being presented with the information about what the Challenger etc. report actually said.
The media mis-reports a lot of things like Hillary's email and Hunter Biden's laptop with cherry-picked misleading factoids, but that is never an excuse for echoing those reports here after being made aware of the factual record.
There's another myth that's spreading: that the new head of the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) is a Trump appointee, E.J. Antoni. However, his nomination was withdrawn due to too many controversies.
The current head is Acting Commissioner, William J. Wiatrowski, who has served in this role twice previously, the first time from January 2017 to March 2019, and the second time from March 2023 to January 2024
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_Labor_Statistics
Global Stocks Trounce the S&P 500 in Trumps Chaotic First Year, Bloomberg, 1/20/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-stocks-trounce-p-500-131530108.html
URL above no longer works, this one does but only for a page or so of the article, then it hits "Story Continued" button that does nothing when clicked: https://web.archive.org/web/20260120223645/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-stocks-trounce-p-500-131530108.html
In fact, equities worldwide once the US is excluded have risen around 30% since he took office a year ago, roughly double the S&P 500s gain, according to MSCIs index. The US hasnt lagged that much during a presidents first year since 1993, when the nation was recovering from a recession and investors were flocking to growing markets overseas.
Trumps comparison with his predecessors is no better: As far as the S&P 500 goes, the first-year gain under Trump clocks in as only the ninth best start to a term since World War II, according to CFRA. Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and even Trump during his first stint all saw bigger gains.
US presidents, of course, dont determine the direction of the stock market, as much as they take the blame or credit. But in Trumps case, his trade war, foreign-policy surprises like pushing for a US takeover of Greenland, moves to exert greater control over key industries, and threat to the Federal Reserves independence have all periodically unnerved investors. That, in turn, has effectively tapped the brakes on a rally driven largely by the artificial-intelligence boom and the surprisingly resilient economy he inherited.
-snip-
[Also] MSCIs emerging-market index rose over 30% last year, its biggest advance since 2017.
Trumps comparison with his predecessors is no better: As far as the S&P 500 goes, the first-year gain under Trump clocks in as only the ninth best start to a term since World War II, according to CFRA. Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and even Trump during his first stint all saw bigger gains.
US presidents, of course, dont determine the direction of the stock market, as much as they take the blame or credit. But in Trumps case, his trade war, foreign-policy surprises like pushing for a US takeover of Greenland, moves to exert greater control over key industries, and threat to the Federal Reserves independence have all periodically unnerved investors. That, in turn, has effectively tapped the brakes on a rally driven largely by the artificial-intelligence boom and the surprisingly resilient economy he inherited.
-snip-
[Also] MSCIs emerging-market index rose over 30% last year, its biggest advance since 2017.
The S&P 500 gained 15.7% in Trump's first year, according to a table in the article, comparing the first year of all presidential terms since (and including) FDR.
US stocks are off to their worst start versus the global market since 1995, Yahoo Finance, 2/18/26
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-are-off-to-their-worst-start-versus-the-global-market-since-1995-110019152.html
*THERE's an iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) VERSUS S&P 500 - where one can set 1 D, 5D, 1M, 6M, YTD (9.7% v. 0.8%), 1Y (31.7% vs. 12.9%), 5Y (30.0% v. 76.7%), ALL (starting about 4/2008: 35% vs. 393%)
(ACWI stands for All Country World Index). One can see that the S&P 500 vastly outperformed the rest of the world in the past 5 years and the past 18 years, but since late 2024, the rest of the world has outperformed the S&P 500.
While the S&P 500 (^GSPC), tracking the largest US companies, has fallen by 1% since the start of the year, an index tracking market returns throughout the rest of the global economy (ACWX) has returned 8%. The trend holds true over the past year, too, where the ex-US index has risen by 30%, triple the 10% return from the US over the same period.
And in an environment where geopolitical risk increasingly comes from inside the US whether from the Trump administration's tariff regime, comments about an annexation of Greenland, or other moves investor attention has turned toward the rest of the world.
...US stocks just keep getting more expensive. ... through the last 10 years, as Big Tech's explosion has driven valuations sky high, US price-to-earnings ratios are now an average of 40% higher than those throughout the rest of the world market.
The US stock market has also become heavily concentrated in the tech sector.
As of December, the top 10 largest companies in the US the "Magnificent Seven" Big Tech stocks, plus Broadcom (AVGO), Eli Lilly (LLY), and Visa (V) accounted for 40% of S&P 500 holdings, according to data from the investment brokerage Lord Abbett, far above the roughly 20% weight of the top 10 holdings a decade ago.
"The US market trades above a 20x P/E even excluding the 'Magnificent 7,'" Goldman Sachs strategists wrote in a recent client note. "This is unusually high."
And in an environment where geopolitical risk increasingly comes from inside the US whether from the Trump administration's tariff regime, comments about an annexation of Greenland, or other moves investor attention has turned toward the rest of the world.
...US stocks just keep getting more expensive. ... through the last 10 years, as Big Tech's explosion has driven valuations sky high, US price-to-earnings ratios are now an average of 40% higher than those throughout the rest of the world market.
The US stock market has also become heavily concentrated in the tech sector.
As of December, the top 10 largest companies in the US the "Magnificent Seven" Big Tech stocks, plus Broadcom (AVGO), Eli Lilly (LLY), and Visa (V) accounted for 40% of S&P 500 holdings, according to data from the investment brokerage Lord Abbett, far above the roughly 20% weight of the top 10 holdings a decade ago.
"The US market trades above a 20x P/E even excluding the 'Magnificent 7,'" Goldman Sachs strategists wrote in a recent client note. "This is unusually high."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
S&P 500 closed Friday 3/20 at 6506, down 1.5% #TREAS Yield # Hot PPI report (Wedn) Last 3 months average 6.6% (ann'd) [View all]
progree
Mar 2025
OP
Kicking: update for Thurs. March 6 close. The "Trump Trade" is back underwater after losing 1.8% for the day (S&P 500)
progree
Mar 2025
#2
Kicking: Update: S&P 500 closed Friday at 5770, up 0.5% for the day but still below the election day close
progree
Mar 2025
#3
Update: S&P 500 closed Monday 3/10 at 5615, down 2.7% for the day and 2.9% below the election day close
progree
Mar 2025
#4
Update: S&P 500 closed Tuesday 3/11 at 5572, down 0.8% for the day, briefly fell into correction territory
progree
Mar 2025
#5
S&P 500 closed Wednesday 3/12 at 5599, up 0.5% for the day, but down 3.2% since election day
progree
Mar 2025
#6
Update: S&P 500 closed Thursday at 5522, down 1.4% for the day, and MORE THAN 10% down from the all-time high
progree
Mar 2025
#7
Update: S&P 500 closed Friday at 5639, up 2.1% for the day, and down 2.5% since election day
progree
Mar 2025
#8
Update: S&P 500 closed Monday at 5675, up 0.6% for the day, and down 1.9% since election day
progree
Mar 2025
#9
Update: S&P 500 closed Tuesday at 5615, down 1.1% for the day, and down 2.9% since election day
progree
Mar 2025
#10
S&P 500 closed Tuesday 3/25 at 5777, up 0.2% for the day, down 0.1% since election day, down 6.0% from ATH
progree
Mar 2025
#11
S&P 500 closed Wednesday 4/02 at 5671, up 0.7% for the day, down 1.9% since election day, down 7.7% from ATH
progree
Apr 2025
#12