Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,744 posts)
4. Since most asylum cases when they actually get to the Congressionally-appointed court
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 09:26 AM
13 hrs ago

are dismissed and deportation order is laid against them, I'm not sure that presents 'no greater risk'.

Same risk of unemployment as anybody else with the person's skills and location, but risk of deportation's an add on. If there's a 15 year backlog in adjudication, sure, but if the government gets its act together and let's that speedy-trial business slosh over to administrative courts that injustice wouldn't occur. (Sometimes me thinks the wrenches in the works are a feature and not a bug.)

Our Congress set up a Title II court, not a Title III court, for all but final appeals. And those seldom get much traction in the Title III courts (whether under Bush II, Obama, Trump 1.0 or Biden), or at least didn't until it became a hot button issue in the last 18 months.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump regulators move to ...»Reply #4