Trump regulators move to curtail lending to undocumented immigrants
Source: Politico
07/13/2026 11:35 AM EDT
Federal regulators on Monday directed banks and credit unions to more closely scrutinize the loans they make to immigrants who are in the country illegally, as part of the Trump administrations broader immigration crackdown.
In new guidance, regulators said that undocumented immigrants may present an elevated credit risk and warned banks to account for the risk that they may lose their job or be deported as they underwrite new loans.
Financial institutions, the guidance says, should take into account that a customers status as an unauthorized immigrant may pose a risk to their ability to repay credit cards, mortgages, auto loans or other loans.
The guidance also says that financial institutions might consider requiring customers to provide evidence of continuing work authorization, among other documentation, as part of their assessment of a customers ability to repay a loan. It also directs banks to be on alert to lending thats concentrated in geographic markets, employers or industries that may be disproportionately affected by the Trump administrations stepped-up immigration enforcement.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/13/trump-regulators-move-to-curtail-lending-to-undocumented-immigrants-00994688
IronLionZion
(51,765 posts)oh wait, that's private equity.
LS0999
(285 posts)If Religion is the opium of the masses then Xenophobia is the crystal meth of the masses
J_William_Ryan
(3,720 posts)Wrong.
That an immigrant might be undocumented doesnt mean he is illegal.
Entitled to due process of the law, immigrants with pending asylum cases present no greater risk.
Trumps immigration agenda is motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.
Igel
(37,743 posts)are dismissed and deportation order is laid against them, I'm not sure that presents 'no greater risk'.
Same risk of unemployment as anybody else with the person's skills and location, but risk of deportation's an add on. If there's a 15 year backlog in adjudication, sure, but if the government gets its act together and let's that speedy-trial business slosh over to administrative courts that injustice wouldn't occur. (Sometimes me thinks the wrenches in the works are a feature and not a bug.)
Our Congress set up a Title II court, not a Title III court, for all but final appeals. And those seldom get much traction in the Title III courts (whether under Bush II, Obama, Trump 1.0 or Biden), or at least didn't until it became a hot button issue in the last 18 months.