Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(173,813 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:33 AM 21 hrs ago

Supreme Court strikes down long-standing campaign finance restrictions [View all]

Source: NBC News

June 30, 2026, 10:28 AM EDT / Updated June 30, 2026, 10:34 AM EDT


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down longtime campaign finance rules challenged by Vice President JD Vance that place limits on how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with individual candidates.

In a 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court found that the restrictions violate free speech rights under the Constitution's First Amendment, based on the theory that political spending is a form of speech.

The challenge was brought by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the campaigns of two candidates in the 2022 elections: Vance, who was then running as a Republican candidate for the Senate in Ohio, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot, a Republican congressman from the same state who lost his re-election bid.

The Federal Election Commission, under the Trump administration, sided with the challengers. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has historically been skeptical of campaign finance restrictions on free speech grounds, and Republicans have often brought challenges against them.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-strikes-long-standing-campaign-finance-restrictions-rcna252593



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-621_h315.pdf

Article updated.

Original article -

Jun. 30, 2026, 10:28 AM EDT

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” the majority decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts said.

Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority ruling on 14th Amendment grounds.

Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, but that it “does contravene a federal statute” adopted in 1940 that addresses the citizenship of people born in the U.S.

The court’s justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#2. Looks like birthright is good. Phew. underpants 21 hrs ago #1
For now. Wednesdays 21 hrs ago #3
Great, so it's a free-for-all. SamuelAdams 21 hrs ago #2
We MUST nullify Citizens United if we're ever going to have a say in our slightlv 21 hrs ago #4
Make Citizens United illegal again! Initech 19 hrs ago #10
So much for campaign finance reform. J_William_Ryan 20 hrs ago #5
Great Timewas 20 hrs ago #6
So this addresses "limits on how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with... CaptainTruth 20 hrs ago #7
I think Citizens United (2010) already took care of the PACs and unlimited spending BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #8
Ok thanks! Just trying to understand the details. CaptainTruth 19 hrs ago #13
As I remind people, because it is rarely discussed, BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #14
Thank you! You're right, it's yet another thing that hasn't received the attention it should in the general population. CaptainTruth 16 hrs ago #16
"Free Speach" my ass..... with this logic the ultra rich can "speak" a hell of a lot more than the rest of us. groundloop 19 hrs ago #9
Money should have never Quanto Magnus 19 hrs ago #11
they'll invest the money they want Marthe48 19 hrs ago #12
"Step right up, get your politician, 2 bits" Buddyzbuddy 18 hrs ago #15
So I guess the Right To Free Speech is not equal! If you have MORE money, you have more FREE SPEECH! This is a flawed Exp 15 hrs ago #17
Corruption equals FREE SPEECH. eom Exp 15 hrs ago #18
And the rich get richer. Kid Berwyn 15 hrs ago #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court strikes dow...