Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,772 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:33 AM 8 hrs ago

Supreme Court strikes down long-standing campaign finance restrictions

Source: NBC News

June 30, 2026, 10:28 AM EDT / Updated June 30, 2026, 10:34 AM EDT


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down longtime campaign finance rules challenged by Vice President JD Vance that place limits on how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with individual candidates.

In a 6-3 ruling authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court found that the restrictions violate free speech rights under the Constitution's First Amendment, based on the theory that political spending is a form of speech.

The challenge was brought by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the campaigns of two candidates in the 2022 elections: Vance, who was then running as a Republican candidate for the Senate in Ohio, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot, a Republican congressman from the same state who lost his re-election bid.

The Federal Election Commission, under the Trump administration, sided with the challengers. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has historically been skeptical of campaign finance restrictions on free speech grounds, and Republicans have often brought challenges against them.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-strikes-long-standing-campaign-finance-restrictions-rcna252593



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-621_h315.pdf

Article updated.

Original article -

Jun. 30, 2026, 10:28 AM EDT

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” the majority decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts said.

Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority ruling on 14th Amendment grounds.

Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, but that it “does contravene a federal statute” adopted in 1940 that addresses the citizenship of people born in the U.S.

The court’s justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court strikes down long-standing campaign finance restrictions (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago OP
#2. Looks like birthright is good. Phew. underpants 8 hrs ago #1
For now. Wednesdays 7 hrs ago #3
Great, so it's a free-for-all. SamuelAdams 8 hrs ago #2
We MUST nullify Citizens United if we're ever going to have a say in our slightlv 7 hrs ago #4
Make Citizens United illegal again! Initech 6 hrs ago #10
So much for campaign finance reform. J_William_Ryan 7 hrs ago #5
Great Timewas 7 hrs ago #6
So this addresses "limits on how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with... CaptainTruth 6 hrs ago #7
I think Citizens United (2010) already took care of the PACs and unlimited spending BumRushDaShow 6 hrs ago #8
Ok thanks! Just trying to understand the details. CaptainTruth 5 hrs ago #13
As I remind people, because it is rarely discussed, BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #14
Thank you! You're right, it's yet another thing that hasn't received the attention it should in the general population. CaptainTruth 3 hrs ago #16
"Free Speach" my ass..... with this logic the ultra rich can "speak" a hell of a lot more than the rest of us. groundloop 6 hrs ago #9
Money should have never Quanto Magnus 6 hrs ago #11
they'll invest the money they want Marthe48 6 hrs ago #12
"Step right up, get your politician, 2 bits" Buddyzbuddy 4 hrs ago #15
So I guess the Right To Free Speech is not equal! If you have MORE money, you have more FREE SPEECH! This is a flawed Exp 2 hrs ago #17
Corruption equals FREE SPEECH. eom Exp 2 hrs ago #18
And the rich get richer. Kid Berwyn 1 hr ago #19

Wednesdays

(23,496 posts)
3. For now.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:06 AM
7 hrs ago

If The Felon gets to replace just ONE of the Democratic-appointed justices, the outcome will be different.

SamuelAdams

(377 posts)
2. Great, so it's a free-for-all.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:38 AM
8 hrs ago

If political spending is free speech, what can Congress do to get money out of politics? Short of a Constitutional amendment, it seems nothing. For a group who claims to be originalists, they sure don't care what the Framers thought about money in politics.

slightlv

(8,220 posts)
4. We MUST nullify Citizens United if we're ever going to have a say in our
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:10 AM
7 hrs ago

government again. Right now, only tech bros and the rich and corporations control government by speech (money). We're locked out because we don't have the money to buy our speech. This is exactly opposite what the founders aimed for. We're going to have to strip this government down to bare bones and build it back in the way We, the People need it to be. Croak, Mr. Prez, please Croak!

J_William_Ryan

(3,669 posts)
5. So much for campaign finance reform.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:30 AM
7 hrs ago

Not that any such reform was going to happen due to Citizens’ United.

Laws will be enacted in accordance with the wishes of the highest bidder.

Timewas

(2,816 posts)
6. Great
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:56 AM
7 hrs ago

These greedy fucks are now getting a key to the bank,just what is needed is more "speech" for these crooked assholes to get richer while not doing their jobs

CaptainTruth

(8,315 posts)
7. So this addresses "limits on how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with...
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:08 PM
6 hrs ago

...individual candidates," but does it have any effect on PACs or other entities that aren't "a national political party committee"?

BumRushDaShow

(173,772 posts)
8. I think Citizens United (2010) already took care of the PACs and unlimited spending
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:15 PM
6 hrs ago

based on the First Amendment, which today's ruling echos.

BumRushDaShow

(173,772 posts)
14. As I remind people, because it is rarely discussed,
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:53 PM
5 hrs ago

but Citizens United stems from that-named group creating this long-form "ad" and demanding the right to air it -



CaptainTruth

(8,315 posts)
16. Thank you! You're right, it's yet another thing that hasn't received the attention it should in the general population.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 03:48 PM
3 hrs ago

I don't know about you, but I have a business to run & it keeps me so busy that even though I'm intensely interested in politics, I find it hard to keep up with everything, especially during the Trump 2.0 Regime. Trump has truly unleashed the "Firehose of Shit," it's clearly the strategy of him/GOP & it's designed to overwhelm opponents because so much bad shit is happening... no one can keep up with it all. 😪

groundloop

(14,007 posts)
9. "Free Speach" my ass..... with this logic the ultra rich can "speak" a hell of a lot more than the rest of us.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:33 PM
6 hrs ago

President Obama was right, Citizens United was a horrible decision and this is just more of the same. Big business and the ultra wealthy own us now.

Marthe48

(23,790 posts)
12. they'll invest the money they want
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:47 PM
6 hrs ago

and are trying to hedge their bets with the safeguard Amerikan voter eligibility act, fascists trying their damnedest to protect the return on their money by fixing every election.

If we don't want fascism, let's act like each of our votes has a value of a billion dollars and use it in every election.

Buddyzbuddy

(3,065 posts)
15. "Step right up, get your politician, 2 bits"
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:07 PM
4 hrs ago

Or, for 30 pieces of silver you can get a gen-u-ine Supreme Court Justice.

Exp

(1,074 posts)
17. So I guess the Right To Free Speech is not equal! If you have MORE money, you have more FREE SPEECH! This is a flawed
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 04:36 PM
2 hrs ago

equation at the base of it. Neither rational nor reasonable, and mathematically unsound.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court strikes dow...