Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin Eden

(15,266 posts)
18. Hitler's blitzkreig into Poland then into western Europe was almost certainly inevitable
Sat Dec 13, 2025, 10:49 AM
15 hrs ago

But did Chamberlain begin arming England for a major war at that time? Did English diplomacy include reaching out to allies to stand firm against further German agression in a collaborative allied military build-up -- sending a strong message that further invasion would be met with a multinational military force?

I believe Chamberlain's Munich agreement sent to Hitler a message of weakness, not strength. I also doubt it delayed Hitler's plan, which was to strike east before striking west.

I'm a little rusty on the history of diplomatic and military preparedness between Chamberlain's "peace in our time" and Hitler's 1939 invasion of Poland, so I'm asking serious questions here.

What I do know is the memory of the 1914-1918 Great War that decimated a generation of young men was still fresh and very painful. The people Did. Not. Want. another major war.

The French thought their Maginot Line would protect them. They had a defensive, as opposed to offensive, mindset.

On the other hand, the British and French (others too?) had agreed to draw the line at Poland. They declared war on Germany when that line was crossed.

Nothing much happened for several months after Germany consolidated its gains in western Poland (Hitler's pact with Stalin had Russia taking eastern Poland). Quiet on the western front promoted a false sense of security while Germany geared up for a blitzkreig that rendered the Maginot Line obsolete.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So he just called him a spineless weasel wolfie001 19 hrs ago #1
And PPP* will no doubt take it as a compliment. ... littlemissmartypants 18 hrs ago #5
pResident Pee Pee? wolfie001 17 hrs ago #13
True that ... he spoke truth NotHardly 16 hrs ago #16
Chamberlane tried to delay the inevitable. BradBo 18 hrs ago #2
"He delayed Hitler just long enough so Britian could arm" speak easy 18 hrs ago #3
radar alone was worth waiting dsc 17 hrs ago #10
You are assuming there would not have been a ground war in Europe. speak easy 17 hrs ago #12
I was meaning from the UK's perspective dsc 17 hrs ago #14
I was assuming that Britain would have preferred a ground war in Europe in 1938 speak easy 9 hrs ago #34
..perhaps what Putin has on Krasnov.. thomski64 18 hrs ago #4
He really delayed nothing. But to your point, at least he wasn't a foreign operative like Krasnov. paleotn 17 hrs ago #7
Hitler's blitzkreig into Poland then into western Europe was almost certainly inevitable Martin Eden 15 hrs ago #18
'sent to Hitler a message of weakness, not strength.' Was that actually a bad thing in the end though really? cstanleytech 13 hrs ago #21
History has certainly judged it to be so Martin Eden 11 hrs ago #24
I heard Chamberlain was worse than that PATRICK 10 hrs ago #31
Well I was thinking more of a blitzkrieg type invasion of England bypassing France for now. cstanleytech 9 hrs ago #35
Blitzkreig depends on air and ground forces. You're aware that Great Britain is an island, right? Martin Eden 8 hrs ago #36
Ahhh, okay thanks for explaining ☺️ cstanleytech 7 hrs ago #37
In his deranged mind, he would take it as a compliment. The Madcap 17 hrs ago #6
Oh my, had not thought of that. niyad 17 hrs ago #9
bacon is a little late to the party. people have been calling krasnov niyad 17 hrs ago #8
Actually, much worse than Chamberlain PATRICK 10 hrs ago #32
Call it what it is in the Russian dictated ""White House peace plan" a surrender document that rewards Putin. Botany 17 hrs ago #11
Why? Playingmantis 16 hrs ago #15
Trump is more like Mussolini Martin Eden 16 hrs ago #17
Maybe he'll rename the U.S Tomainia? Dave Bowman 11 hrs ago #28
Mini-Mussolini thought crime 1 hr ago #38
An apt reference for Donald Trump. ProudMNDemocrat 15 hrs ago #19
Trump is far worse than Chamberlain. Whereas the name "Chamberlain" is synonymous with appeasement, Trump Martin68 14 hrs ago #20
Bacon criticizes Piggy. nt SeattleVet 12 hrs ago #22
NOW he gets his brass balls! On his way out. Grins 12 hrs ago #23
Why is my Magic 8 Ball running with Quisling? Brother Buzz 11 hrs ago #25
If so... in a Mussolini bodysuit and a Hitler complex. ananda 11 hrs ago #26
Far worse than Chamberlain. yorkster 11 hrs ago #27
much worse than chambrtlain, who did not actually join the axis rampartd 11 hrs ago #29
There is a huge fallacy with this comparison. Bluetus 10 hrs ago #30
Agree PATRICK 10 hrs ago #33
He appeases like Chamberlain but thinks like Charles Lindbergh thought crime 1 hr ago #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bacon calls Trump 'the ne...»Reply #18