Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

xocetaceans

(4,321 posts)

10. So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection?

Reply to biophile (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 11:36 AM

19 hrs ago

What gives you such confidence in that ability and what about the other numbers of transmission cases? Do you think that those are transmissions are fine, too?

Out of about 3,600,000 newborns per year in the US, how many constitute that minuscule number of transmissions that you too would accept and tolerate as fine? What do you wish on them in lieu of a safe and effective vaccination against such an eminently avoidable disease?

RFK, Jr. is not correct and is wholly unqualified and is pathetically incompetent as the leader of HHS.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

area51 SunSeeker

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US vaccine advisers say not all babies need a hepatitis B shot at birth [View all] BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago OP

Illinois has enacted snowybirdie 20 hrs ago #1

Parents should demand their pediatricians follow the Illinois vaccination schedule. FarPoint 20 hrs ago #3

There are a couple "regional" health alliances/colaboratives BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #5

And yet he might be right about this one. TheRickles 20 hrs ago #2

Agree on this one vaccine- totally unnecessary unless the mother was at risk as a drug abuser biophile 19 hrs ago #4

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? xocetaceans 19 hrs ago #10

No, it's not for me personally to decide biophile 19 hrs ago #12

To be clearer, my post indicates that the knowledge a person needs to have in order to carry out what you seem . . . xocetaceans 6 hrs ago #21

Some HepB + mothers aren't tested. Or they have false-negative results. mainer 19 hrs ago #6

Asian Americans are at higher risk. deurbano 19 hrs ago #7

So, your theory is that you can perfectly identify a subgroup of babies which ought to be given protection? What . . . xocetaceans 19 hrs ago #8

Utter hogwash. You don't know what you're talking about. PSPS 19 hrs ago #13

Wait a minute... maybe I misunderstood you... slightlv 18 hrs ago #16

What damage does giving every baby the Hep B vaccine cause? NickB79 9 hrs ago #20

I should say that Magatry is a murder-suicide cult. ananda 19 hrs ago #9

I think waiting till babies are older is a good idea womanofthehills 19 hrs ago #11

Oh, please. The liver damage can already be happeinig before babies "are older." PSPS 19 hrs ago #14

Fevers are scary. But they are only one indicator in a myriad of symptoms used to diagnose problems. ... littlemissmartypants 18 hrs ago #17

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a baby killer. nt SunSeeker 18 hrs ago #15

So which ones will need it then? mdbl 17 hrs ago #18

In a brutal week for public health, the chairman on the Senate health committee could act. So why doesn't he? https://bs LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #19