through that money so fast they have to start charging customers much more.
These companies lose money with every new customer. Customers they would not get if they charged people what it costs the company.
Ed Zitron has been pointing out the industry is a scam. He had another newsletter on that today:
https://www.wheresyoured.at/four-horsemen-of-the-aipocalypse/
Anthropics growth story is a sham built on selling subscriptions that let users burn anywhere from $8 to $13.50 for every dollar of subscription revenue and providing a brittle, inconsistent service, made possible only through a near-infinite stream of venture capital money and infrastructure providers footing the bill for data center construction.
Put another way, Anthropic doesnt have to play by the rules. Venture capital funding allows it to massively subsidize its services. The endless, breathless support from the media runs cover for the deterioration of its services. A lack of any true regulation of tech, let alone AI, means that it can rugpull its customers with varying rate limits whenever it feels like.
If Anthropic were forced to charge its actual costs and no, I dont believe its API is profitable no matter how many people misread Dario Amodeis interview its growth would quickly fall apart as customers faced the real costs of AI (which Ill get to in a bit). If Anthropic was forced to provide a stable service, it would have to stop accepting new customers or massively increase its inference costs.
Anthropic is a con, and said con is only made possible through endless, specious hype. Everybody who blindly applauded everything this company did is a mark.