Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RPM

(5,652 posts)
5. Not nonsense, but total sense in the framework you note
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 09:26 PM
Wednesday

The Code, especially Subchapters C and N, are built to facilitate (tax) efficient capital formation. But that's simply a policy decision - which, given certain circumstances, could be changed.

BS? Sure. But nonsense - hardly, it's built - again, as you note, the mega-wealthy.

Now - corporation law, that's some really loaded stuff. Would be interesting to see what a return to mid 19-th century corporation law would look like (e.g., corporations existing for a specific purposes and at the pleasure of the state - theoretically, the people - and not being allowed to own other corporations vs. the modern general incorporation statutes and holding company regime). You want to make them smaller and easier to control? Overturn not only Citizens United, but more importantly Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The number of large corpo...»Reply #5