Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(132,523 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 07:08 PM 23 hrs ago

The number of large corporations that paid absolutely zero in federal tax was at least 88, including Tesla, Coinbase,

Rep. Jayapal: Do you know how many of the largest corporations paid absolutely nothing in federal income tax?

Vought: Not off the top of my head...

Rep. Jayapal: The number of large corporations that paid absolutely zero in federal tax was at least 88, including Tesla, Coinbase, and Palantir.

FactPost (@factpostnews.bsky.social) 2026-04-15T17:15:34.651337852Z
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The number of large corporations that paid absolutely zero in federal tax was at least 88, including Tesla, Coinbase, (Original Post) applegrove 23 hrs ago OP
Kickin with DISGUST. Faux pas 22 hrs ago #1
well... they do, but: RPM 21 hrs ago #4
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 22 hrs ago #2
Not nonsense, but total sense in the framework you note RPM 21 hrs ago #5
Exposure kick oasis 22 hrs ago #3

Faux pas

(16,418 posts)
1. Kickin with DISGUST.
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 08:22 PM
22 hrs ago

If corporations are "people" and people pay taxes, corporations should PAY TAXES TOO FFS. It's only logical.

RPM

(5,651 posts)
4. well... they do, but:
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 09:21 PM
21 hrs ago

they, corporate "persons" get to deduct all expenses (including their excess losses - net operating losses or NOLs - over income against future income - likely what those companies are doing.

human persons (i.e., individuals) have a much more limited array of deductions - therefore never really hitting 0 income unless truly not earning much / anything.

Wild stuff. Happy 4/15!

Response to applegrove (Original post)

RPM

(5,651 posts)
5. Not nonsense, but total sense in the framework you note
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 09:26 PM
21 hrs ago

The Code, especially Subchapters C and N, are built to facilitate (tax) efficient capital formation. But that's simply a policy decision - which, given certain circumstances, could be changed.

BS? Sure. But nonsense - hardly, it's built - again, as you note, the mega-wealthy.

Now - corporation law, that's some really loaded stuff. Would be interesting to see what a return to mid 19-th century corporation law would look like (e.g., corporations existing for a specific purposes and at the pleasure of the state - theoretically, the people - and not being allowed to own other corporations vs. the modern general incorporation statutes and holding company regime). You want to make them smaller and easier to control? Overturn not only Citizens United, but more importantly Santa Clara v. Southern Pacific.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The number of large corpo...