Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Swalwell being rat fucked? (Poll) [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(27,090 posts)34. "They have had nine years to speak up and they chose this particular moment to bring a charge?"
The first accuser has not brought a charge. The San Francisco Chronicle, which reported the original story, reached out to her first.
https://archive.ph/IDj4E
The Chronicle is not identifying the woman in this story in compliance with its policy against naming alleged victims of sexual assault. Reporters looking into the broader allegations against Swalwell reached her while contacting dozens of his former staffers.
The woman began speaking with a Chronicle reporter last month as she considered whether to make her allegations public. When rumors about Swalwells conduct began circulating online, the woman said she was confused because she had told only a small circle of family and close friends about what had happened to her. She said she was petrified that Swalwell had told people about their encounters or that her name had appeared in an opposition research file compiled by a rival campaign.
She said she called the Swalwell campaign in late March to find out whether her name had surfaced among rumored victims. A staffer on the campaign, she said, asked her to vouch for Swalwell.
She said the staffer asked her whether Swalwell had ever been inappropriate with her, and then, when she hesitated to answer, said, Actually, I dont want to know. When the campaign staffer told her that Swalwell was not afraid of the rumors because he had not done anything inappropriate, the woman said she felt determined to speak out.
The woman began speaking with a Chronicle reporter last month as she considered whether to make her allegations public. When rumors about Swalwells conduct began circulating online, the woman said she was confused because she had told only a small circle of family and close friends about what had happened to her. She said she was petrified that Swalwell had told people about their encounters or that her name had appeared in an opposition research file compiled by a rival campaign.
She said she called the Swalwell campaign in late March to find out whether her name had surfaced among rumored victims. A staffer on the campaign, she said, asked her to vouch for Swalwell.
She said the staffer asked her whether Swalwell had ever been inappropriate with her, and then, when she hesitated to answer, said, Actually, I dont want to know. When the campaign staffer told her that Swalwell was not afraid of the rumors because he had not done anything inappropriate, the woman said she felt determined to speak out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Huh? Every member of the House is only currently serving through the end of the year.
Wiz Imp
Apr 12
#72
He's not every member of the house. He's a guy who screwed up big time and will be out of politics altogether soon.
Attilatheblond
Apr 12
#78
You seem to be shadow boxing for no particular reason. I don't disagree that he is still in the House but he's DONE
Attilatheblond
Apr 12
#84
No, this goes to judgement, which he showed very little of!! He put himself in the position to be blackmailed,
Pisces
Apr 11
#57
Option 6: When this shit comes up in the middle of a campaign, we should be very skeptical
Bluetus
Apr 11
#9
"They have had nine years to speak up and they chose this particular moment to bring a charge?"
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 11
#34
You are seriously asking a question regarding why sexual assault is (commonly/frequently) not reported?
stopdiggin
Apr 11
#19
there are people with inside knowledge (within his own campaign?) that appear to be
stopdiggin
Apr 11
#22
Hey DU peeps who are smarter than me re the internets. I caught a brief statement supposedly made by Roger Stone
Ninga
Apr 11
#21
Because journalists were reporting out the allegations. It takes weeks to months to nail a story like this down, and it
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 11
#23
You need an option for "He should drop out of the Governor's race, but stay in his Congressional seat until...
LudwigPastorius
Apr 11
#25
Im just curious on those believing this is a set up - have you read the SF Cheonicle and/or CNN reporting
Nanjeanne
Apr 11
#35
If it's not ratfucking, the accusers should go to the authorities rather than the media.
W_HAMILTON
Apr 11
#49
It's not a double standard. Then statute of limitations had expired and it was pre-Me Too.
W_HAMILTON
Apr 11
#58
Some of the SOL's are only 5 years, and it takes victims time to emotionally process these things.
pnwmom
Apr 12
#65
It sounds like you believe that staying silent or going to the police are the only two options for someone who's
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 13
#90
I believe that if you are willing to tell your story to the media about your alleged sexual assault...
W_HAMILTON
Apr 13
#93
That's what you gleaned from the comments, but I didn't. And it really doesn't matter.
pnwmom
Apr 13
#98
The original victim didn't go to authorities because she didn't think they'd believe her. And the media came to her.
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#71
Well, it sure looks like lots believe her snd support her, so now she should go to the police.
W_HAMILTON
Apr 12
#75