General Discussion

QueerDuck

(1,376 posts)

31. Remember "Killer Kamala" and the ugly chants of...

Reply to senseandsensibility (Original post)

Wed Feb 25, 2026, 06:37 PM

Yesterday

... "Leave it Blank!" (It all started with certain elected officials encouraging their Democratic constituents to disengage and vote uncommitted.)

I guess they showed us, eh? 🙄🤪

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

But we can't have a female President, right? [View all] senseandsensibility Yesterday OP

Rec for "it's a damn shame". Truer words never spoken. Whyisthisstillclose Yesterday #1

I'd like to believe that we could Bettie Yesterday #2

I feel similarly senseandsensibility Yesterday #3

Yes, we can. It's inevitable. But MadameButterfly Yesterday #30

Spanberger just got to the Governor's office Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #4

The same people who are pushing talking points to discourage women from running Quiet Em Yesterday #5

Well, sometimes reality has a way of overtaking "conventional wisdom" senseandsensibility Yesterday #7

I still am optimistic because anything can happen and all the changes we are and will go thru until 2028 Deuxcents 20 hrs ago #38

No one is running yet. Not even Newsom. maxsolomon Yesterday #6

I wish this rhetoric would stop here TheProle Yesterday #8

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Yesterday #10

Not really. Torchlight Yesterday #35

I loved what I heard from the governor BaronChocula Yesterday #9

No, we can't get the red out Yesterday #11

I think we are fooling ourselves if we ignore or refuse to admit senseandsensibility Yesterday #24

Agree get the red out 15 hrs ago #39

Two capable women Aviation Pro Yesterday #12

Careful what to wish for. The Grand Illuminist Yesterday #13

And that has Nothing to do with Cha Yesterday #18

The first female POTUS will be a GOPer leftstreet Yesterday #14

I will continue to support women candidates. The consequences of NOT going with the woman are becoming... NNadir Yesterday #15

To me she didn't project strength. Hieronymus Phact Yesterday #16

Oh please... Are you saying the "They're eating the dogs" orange guy projected "strength?" NNadir 13 hrs ago #41

believe it or not Hieronymus Phact 12 hrs ago #42

Well I haven't "learned" anything from this comment irrespective of a claim... NNadir 11 hrs ago #43

"weak perceptual abilities" Nice way to insult someone. Hieronymus Phact 10 hrs ago #45

I'm with you. And WHY is a male candidate playing it safe? We need to get over the hidden misogyny, dammit. Joinfortmill Yesterday #17

Running as "a woman" is asking to lose gulliver Yesterday #19

she could be the dark horse. nt Javaman Yesterday #20

Just watched she rocked it. ALBliberal Yesterday #21

Governor Spanberger is too moderate for many here. TomSlick Yesterday #22

I'm on the progressive side but I would vote for her senseandsensibility Yesterday #25

I'm unprepared to commit until we know who is running in the primary. TomSlick Yesterday #28

Yeah, the same. senseandsensibility Yesterday #29

Too much time. TomSlick Yesterday #32

In most other places, it's not an issue. But by comparison the U.S. is a backward country. I don't see a woman getting Fil1957 Yesterday #23

That's WHY misogynist men don't want WOMEN To LEAD! Bread and Circuses Yesterday #26

This message was self-deleted by its author senseandsensibility Yesterday #27

They left out the "n" at the end of Misogynist Men. maxsolomon Yesterday #33

Okay, thanks. senseandsensibility Yesterday #34

Remember "Killer Kamala" and the ugly chants of... QueerDuck Yesterday #31

Couple thoughts BlueHurricane 22 hrs ago #36

Can we quit trying to get the "first women" kwolf68 22 hrs ago #37

Little girls care obamanut2012 13 hrs ago #40

No SocialDemocrat61 11 hrs ago #44

There's an assumption for some that a woman candidate is only running as "a woman" when she's doing no such thing, betsuni 10 hrs ago #46