Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: But we can't have a female President, right? [View all]senseandsensibility
(24,660 posts)24. I think we are fooling ourselves if we ignore or refuse to admit
how sexist many, many voters are. This past election was a real eye opener for me. They used the "manosphere" to win, and I believe it was coordinated. The RW, funded by billionaires, can and will use whatever they can to defeat Dems. But the sexism is particularly potent, apparently.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The same people who are pushing talking points to discourage women from running
Quiet Em
20 hrs ago
#5
Well, sometimes reality has a way of overtaking "conventional wisdom"
senseandsensibility
20 hrs ago
#7
I still am optimistic because anything can happen and all the changes we are and will go thru until 2028
Deuxcents
11 hrs ago
#38
I will continue to support women candidates. The consequences of NOT going with the woman are becoming...
NNadir
19 hrs ago
#15
Oh please... Are you saying the "They're eating the dogs" orange guy projected "strength?"
NNadir
3 hrs ago
#41
I'm with you. And WHY is a male candidate playing it safe? We need to get over the hidden misogyny, dammit.
Joinfortmill
19 hrs ago
#17