Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ocelot II

(129,952 posts)

3. Moving kids from state to state would be federal (Mann Act).

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:30 PM

Wednesday

But states have their own statutes that cover child abuse within their borders. Depending on statutes of limitations (states may have extended statutes of limitations or none at all for sexual abuse of minors) it's likely that state charges could be brought in some cases if local prosecutors are willing to do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

niyad kcoates bluestarone Hugin Talitha

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Epstein files questions. [View all] bluestarone Wednesday OP

New Mexico has launched an investigation of Epstein's former ranch. Stay tuned. Chasstev365 Wednesday #1

Yea thats' AWESOME!! bluestarone Wednesday #4

Interstate sex trafficking charges would be the federal kind, so no (nt) AZJonnie Wednesday #2

Moving kids from state to state would be federal (Mann Act). Ocelot II Wednesday #3