Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The reform must be durable. Just adding 4 seats and nothing else is an exerise in futility.
Wanderlust988
Dec 20
#1
You're wanting to govern out of anger. You need to play the long view, not a short term sugar high
Wanderlust988
Dec 20
#8
Your first two solutions would require a Constitutional Amendment. SCOTUS Expansion does not.
Celerity
Dec 20
#4
Article III states that these judges "hold their office during good behavior," which means they have a lifetime
Celerity
Dec 20
#33
While the USSC is being revamped the justices should be split up and required to live and reside in the circuit they are
in2herbs
Dec 20
#31
Not if the justices were required to live and reside in the circuit they have been assigned.
in2herbs
Dec 20
#32
I agree. Far more judges and rotate the benches they sit on so they cannot
travelingthrulife
Dec 20
#15
So what? The Constitution was designed as a living document. We won't survive another court
travelingthrulife
Dec 20
#16
We should add 20-30 judges or more. Our population has grown, why not the USSC?
travelingthrulife
Dec 20
#14
Expanding the court and governing fearlessly will provide that result. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Dec 20
#25