Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]UTUSN
(77,120 posts)9. I have no way to answer the questions. The podcaster is one with PAKMAN, Luke BEASELEY, Meidas, even Keith EDWARDS
that I sample most often - as opposed to many on our side who are, I don't know/sort of staid/unwatchable. But all of these are honest.
As for the "guessing" part, this particular one is just one of several as I said with this same topic. He didn't invent the topic, so not "guessing" as such.
Just saying that your "pretty believable Substack from a Ph.D" without further, down deep verification is in the adjacent category as this podcaster who is just relaying information. And I'm just posting something that sounds "pretty believable" to me. I have zero credentials beyond that.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And besides his face paint, what's with the non-painted purple eyelids, and the unpainted outside the lines?
UTUSN
Dec 12
#2
Why would anyone do that in front of a window? Are we sure that's not fake? These scream YouTube things are
Srkdqltr
Dec 12
#4
No, I personally can't/don't vouch for the picture. The podcaster's content is credible for me (who am I).
UTUSN
Dec 12
#5
A true anecdote: Once (so far) I posted something from (I forget: ) AP, Reuters, NPR and
UTUSN
Dec 13
#7
Read a pretty believable Substack from a Ph.D saying it's much more likely to be FTD
AZJonnie
Dec 12
#6
Well, that seals it for me! - Isn't there a Congresscritter involved in this somewhere?
UTUSN
Dec 13
#10
That is not the point. The title of the video is false. There was no leak of which meds Trump is on.
Celerity
Dec 13
#15
Don't tell me what *my* point is. Your idee fixe about the non-leak and the guessing
UTUSN
Dec 13
#20
You will contradict anything I say to you. (Now say you won't and therefore agree.) So let's wave from the
UTUSN
Dec 13
#31
I have no way to answer the questions. The podcaster is one with PAKMAN, Luke BEASELEY, Meidas, even Keith EDWARDS
UTUSN
Dec 13
#9
I think the basis for "leaks" and speculation is to try to force them to 'fess up
bucolic_frolic
Dec 13
#29
"The info was leaked" implies an action & certainty level that is not backed up by the evidence presented in the video
AZJonnie
Dec 13
#32
Here's Meidas a few minutes ago. Somebody will likely have a beef with this title, too,
UTUSN
Dec 13
#22
For the record, the video is not mine, the graphic is not mine and I paid no attention to it.
UTUSN
Dec 13
#30
You don't "care" yet choose to add to it. I've bitten my tongue over more, actually offensive posts than
UTUSN
Dec 13
#34
"Must have confirmed amyloid plaque in the brain via imaging or spinal fluid tests. "
bucolic_frolic
Dec 13
#27