Hand IV. Multiple MRIs. All signs of an anti dementia drug regimine.

Questionable.

And I am no authority on AI and detest being fooled by it as I've been a couple of times. I myself post what I think is on the level, although I admit that in different moods I post eratically (but not nefariously).

As for this topic goes, this podcaster is not the only one, him and the rest riffing off of some recent news events.

You can be assured that I'm sharing from uplifting-to-us motives, not to mislead if I can help it.

As far as the picture goes, I put it in the category of clickbait journo headlines that don't belong to the author of the article/video content. But I don't blame you for being skeptical and hope that you will contribute any research on "leqembi" or symptoms of the condition and its effects on the patient and caretakers and our national case.

somebody immediately Replied, "Is this AI?"

Frustrating.

aka Frontotemporal Dementia than Alzheimer's based on the symptoms we are all witnessing.

What is the basis of saying his medication has been "leaked" presented in the video? Or is it actually just someone guessing?

Not that Congresscritters aren't capable of guessing.


*** Well, by popular demand, I'll let this go where it popularly will go - nighty nite to all!

are guesses, opinions, feelings, spitting in the wind - somebody who detests arguing (me) would like to be able to let my guard down with good faith posts without having to be defensive on a life or death basis.

Is a deflection of the general topic and your have no problem when other guessings are proffered without any more substantiation than is in this video.

There is a point when relentlessness becomes destructive - or in internet terms, flaming. Paraphrase from the Iliad: Achilles, be not you relentless; only death is relentless; that's why men hate him so.

decks of our ships passing in the night. Bon voyage.

You just copied the title of the vid, nothing wrong with that. I was only questioning what I would call a "click-bait" title that the maker of the video chose. NOTHING wrong with you sharing it, I'm not saying you're accountable or anything like that, not arguing with you, just the video creator. I'm just generally tired of so many youtuber's choosing false headlines, and I guess that sort-of made you feel caught in the crossfire. I should've chose my words more carefully

Might be the reference.
The blood leak is a side effect.

Too much blood leak in the brain is often associated with a subsequent stroke.

that I sample most often - as opposed to many on our side who are, I don't know/sort of staid/unwatchable. But all of these are honest.

As for the "guessing" part, this particular one is just one of several as I said with this same topic. He didn't invent the topic, so not "guessing" as such.

Just saying that your "pretty believable Substack from a Ph.D" without further, down deep verification is in the adjacent category as this podcaster who is just relaying information. And I'm just posting something that sounds "pretty believable" to me. I have zero credentials beyond that.

They might say, "no it's not that" implying it is something else. What we have so far is total obfuscation, hence the speculation.

There was no "leak". It was false advertising by the youtube creator (not our DU'er friend to be clear).

That's my only point on this subject, along with the fact that I've seen speculation elsewhere that the observable symptoms match FTD better than Alzheimers, and that this speculation seemed reasonable.

FWIW

ago. The doctor is credible and makes sense.

and call it guessing. It will always be guessing until the point he literally collapses or something is undeniably confirmed. And there are scads of these posts out there, even if they are just a sign of our desperation for him to be gone from our public life.

It's certainly a possibility.

However, using an AI image to pretend that there is evidence is really, really stupid. We need to stop doing that. Makes us look stupid.

Who is the "we" and "stupid" ones "doing that"? I suppose the whole contingent of the dwellers on the guessing tangent is going to go on and on and I'm not Replying to them. What's irritating is that a general topic that was intended to bolster our desperate hopes for this person to be out of our public life is deflected by a drumbeat of somethng else. I'm sure that when somebody different posts the same thing soon will be balleyhooed.

Instead, it was your choice to post that video here in General Discussion. Did you think it depicted an actual recorded scene of Trump and some medical professional? I don't know the answer to that question. Nor do I care.

My point was to make it clear that it is an AI image or video. There are no photos of Trump being treated by any medical person.

Many people post questionable videos and images here on DU. When I notice that, I sometimes mention it in a reply to an OP that does that. Why? Because we cannot trust images and videos these days. It's too easy to have an AI program create a video or image containing anything you can think up. That often causes confusion.

Clickbait podcasts and fake videos that use words and images that are not truthful help no cause. Instead, they provide yet one more source of inaccurate or downright faked information. Many people accept such things as truthful and share them widely.

I find that to be disturbing, since it spreads more nonsense to more people and makes truthful information questionable. Who are we to trust for information?

So, I comment on such AI crap when I recognize it. If you post it, I will comment, and so will several others who value truth as the only acceptable standard.

Do whatever you want, but do not expect that false information will not be called out. I will call it out and so will many other people here.

I choose not to enumerate.

Ain't it wonderful?

n/t

Can't hide much from AI these days.

But it eats my soul that he is willing to collapse the healthcare system in the US for everyone else. As long as he gets care….that is all The rest of us will be lucky to get care, private insurance or not and now that he has removed minimum care standards for nursing facilities ugly days are here! Care was marginal before the change.

could stand alone without shutting it off, but hopes/trust are dashed again. When the repeated points are interminable no Reply will suffice, so the only way is to shut it off. STENDAL's "Happy Few" are understanding and the rest will never be in the fellowship.

So here is the full OP, and let the Self-Delete proceed: