Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Senate Democrats hoped the threat of soaring insurance premiums would force Republicans to act" [View all]
I won't pretend to understand why we keep giving Republicans the benefit of doubt, that they will do the right thing if they only understand what's at stake.
They...don't...CARE.
And I also won't pretend to understand why they are confident they'll hold onto the House and Senate next year of tens of millions of Americans see their healthcare premiums double or triple, or they have to forego coverage altogether because they can no longer afford it.
YES...GERRYMANDERING. I GET IT. But will Republican dirty tricks and the six "conservative" justices on the SCOTUS with their heads lodged in Trump's colon be enough to overcome this? WILL the people who LOSE coverage BELIEVE Trump when he says it's all BIDEN'S fault?
When a group of Senate Democrats voted last month to reopen the government on the promise that theyd get a vote to extend the expiring Obamacare subsidies they hoped the threat of soaring insurance premiums would force Republicans to act. Now theyre hoping the failure of that vote can reignite negotiations.
On Thursday, dueling health care proposals collapsed in the Senate, all but guaranteeing dramatic premium hikes for people enrolled in plans under the Affordable Care Act once the enhanced subsidies expire on Jan. 1.
In the first vote, a Republican plan to replace the subsidies with direct-to-consumer payments deposited into Health Savings Accounts $1,000 a year for enrollees age 18 to 49, and $1,500 for enrollees over 50 failed to clear the 60-vote threshold for cloture, 51-48, with the vote falling largely along party lines. (Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky was the sole Republican to join Democrats in voting no.)
The GOP proposal also would have included a host of other reforms, including enshrining restrictions on the HSA funds so they cant be used for abortions.
https://www.ms.now/news/senate-face-plants-health-care-obamacare-premiums
On Thursday, dueling health care proposals collapsed in the Senate, all but guaranteeing dramatic premium hikes for people enrolled in plans under the Affordable Care Act once the enhanced subsidies expire on Jan. 1.
In the first vote, a Republican plan to replace the subsidies with direct-to-consumer payments deposited into Health Savings Accounts $1,000 a year for enrollees age 18 to 49, and $1,500 for enrollees over 50 failed to clear the 60-vote threshold for cloture, 51-48, with the vote falling largely along party lines. (Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky was the sole Republican to join Democrats in voting no.)
The GOP proposal also would have included a host of other reforms, including enshrining restrictions on the HSA funds so they cant be used for abortions.
https://www.ms.now/news/senate-face-plants-health-care-obamacare-premiums
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Senate Democrats hoped the threat of soaring insurance premiums would force Republicans to act" [View all]
Miles Archer
Dec 11
OP
Why are you going on about flight delays and not SNAP and federal worker paychecks?
FascismIsDeath
Dec 11
#8