Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

W_HAMILTON

(9,983 posts)

13. The January 6th part is unambiguous.

Reply to ToxMarz (Reply #8)

Sat Dec 6, 2025, 08:11 AM

Dec 6

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Legeally Speaking, hasn't the Jan 6th Pipe Bomber already been pardoned? [View all] Chasstev365 Dec 6 OP

So he didn't really have to pardon all of those people separately Walleye Dec 6 #1

this is sometimes warranted . carter pardoned the "draft dodgers" rampartd Dec 6 #5

Carters draft dodger pardon was not "a complete and uncondtional pardon to all individuals" ToxMarz Dec 6 #9

just the only time i've seen pardons or multiple unnamed people rampartd Dec 6 #15

He will probably walk away unpunished. Emile Dec 6 #2

Which might be ok, if it wasn't him... nt Shipwack Dec 6 #3

I think he has already admitted that he did it. Emile Dec 6 #4

Admitting that he did it AND that he did it in response to the "stolen election," probably gets him off the hook. 3Hotdogs Dec 6 #11

Not if the pipe bombs were placed on Jan. 5. bluedigger Dec 6 #6

Good point but this could be "related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021" ToxMarz Dec 6 #8

The January 6th part is unambiguous. W_HAMILTON Dec 6 #13

Yes, related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. ToxMarz Dec 6 #14

It literally does. W_HAMILTON Dec 6 #16

What it actually literally says is ToxMarz Dec 6 #17

You keep erasing "related to" Anxy Dec 7 #24

Was it intended to blow up on January 6th? Anxy Dec 7 #23

IMHO, "related to events" eliminates any date restriction debsy Dec 6 #7

Yes, this pardon was to cover the politicians Johonny Dec 6 #19

Has his picture ever been published? KS Toronado Dec 6 #10

The pipe bombs were planted on January 5th... W_HAMILTON Dec 6 #12

Were they intended to detonate on January 5 or the 6th?? Anxy Dec 7 #25

There is no way his lawyers wont inquire Johonny Dec 6 #18

I'd be surprised if Trump and the mob want "planting bombs" to count as "related to our peaceful demo ... muriel_volestrangler Dec 6 #20

the language was drafted intentionally broad. harumph Dec 6 #21

I doubt that Presidential Proclamation covered future cases. Make7 Dec 6 #22

Does that mean he pardoned himself, NameAlreadyTaken Dec 7 #26

He is already pardoned, the "related" part covers him. The coup rolls on. Prob get his name on the arch Blues Heron Dec 7 #27

When was he "convicted?" onenote Dec 7 #28

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legeally Speaking, hasn't...»Reply #13