Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(14,980 posts)
12. No reason why they couldn't. With more ships in the area. It's actually easier.
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 02:39 PM
Friday

Not to mention there's been a software program in place that provides point of intercept facial recognition of people already of the US radar for drug runners, black market smugglers, terrorists, or "enemy intelligence agents" for quite a few years now.
Successful maritime criminal and terrorist activity interdiction has been around for over a decade.

It's a sign of real moral perversion to just start escalating a tenuous situation by just murdering people suspected in wrong doing like it's some sort of action hero movie - or to approve of such actions.

When "evidence" is destroyed, how can you prove it was somehow justifiable to legal idiots, or was just gratuitous murder? That's why the Navy and Coast Guard used to bring back the contraband to be recorded, tested and traced to point of origin, and then used to determine the smuggler's points of contacts in the US.

But now. It's just a bunch of chest thumping, killing random people and destroying any possible evidence that could prove anything.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Except the world isn't OK with it. Disaffected Friday #1
If evidence of the drugs exists. Norrrm Friday #2
The reason: Letting the Coast Guard continue as they have done for decades is not as fun for blood thirsty MAGAs Attilatheblond Friday #3
Murderous psychopaths don't worry about reasons Alice Kramden Friday #4
Because they want to murder and the action you propose isn't that? RockRaven Friday #5
They're trying to intimidate the smugglers. maxsolomon Friday #6
They needed a bigger Epstein distraction. yourout Friday #7
They didn't want to endanger the war ships of the fragile U.S. Navy by 4 guys in a boat. Ping Tung Friday #8
They are lazy. Picking them up and charging them is way too much work and dosnt go BOOM. Srkdqltr Friday #9
The goal of these terrorist attacks by the U.S. has nothing to do with drugs. yardwork Friday #10
I served in the US Navy from 1990 to 2010 aboard 4 different ships in that time NavyDem Friday #11
From someone who's served to another... thank you for your service. mikelewis Saturday #20
No reason why they couldn't. With more ships in the area. It's actually easier. haele Friday #12
Blowing up boats is better for ratings... Wounded Bear Friday #13
Three Reasons: Epstein, Epstein and Epstein. It's WAG THE DOG! usonian Friday #14
Not supporting any action taken, but drones, etc., don't get troops killed. We should use those if/when legitimate. Silent Type Friday #15
It's not about interdiction, it's about generating "casus belli" 0rganism Friday #16
I think they should have followed them to shore Emile Friday #17
This is a multi-part operation: Thunderbeast Friday #18
No jollies? Bayard Friday #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So... is there any reason...»Reply #12