Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(22,006 posts)
12. I think it will be prioritized by who offended Little Lord Pissypants the most
Sun Jun 1, 2025, 08:34 AM
Jun 2025

AS WE KNOW, if someone hurts his precious feelings, they go on the list and become "the failing (fill in name)," "no-talent (fill in name)," "not very bright (fill in name)"...

...and, the primary sin someone like Rachel has committed it so LAUGH AT HIS MAJESTY. O'Donnell does it too, but he's much more subtle. He gets a certain smile on his face and lowers the volume of his voice and it is the equivalent of laughing at Trump, so people like that would either go down FIRST, or go down LAST.

CONTEXT: My boss at a major Silicon Valley company was a prince among men. He reported to the director. The guy hated my boss' guts. The company laid off 8500 people. This director did ALL OF THE LAYOFFS in our department and SAVED MY BOSS FOR LAST because he wanted him to have a FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY and believe he "escaped the noose." My boss was also recovering from back surgery at the time so his worry / paranoia / etc as escalated. The director KNEW this, SAVORED THIS, and enjoyed every minute of his little game. This could be described as "Trumpian" behavior, I'd say. The cruelty and the glee that comes from BEING cruel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"... there is no creating...»Reply #12