General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Charges Merrick Garland delayed or dragged his feet on the investigation are proven false in the Smith report [View all]bigtree
(91,778 posts)...he's already a convicted felon.
We can see for ourselves that convicted felons can still run for the presidency, be elected, and assume office, even from jail. So this nonsense about the DOJ being responsible for the election result is a falsehood.
EVERYONE knows Trump tried to steal the election. Enough voters just did not care this time around.
With that illogical reasoning of yours, you can blame DOJ for anything that happened at the same time. The election ended an ongoing prosecution that was dragged out by the courts until we voted.
Continuing to cover for those judges and justices who actually were the ones who delayed an indictment from going to trial for over a year assures that they will do it again. We all need to get some backbone and stand up to the actual people responsible, instead of diverting from them.
Are you okay with the Supreme Court interfering to invent immunity for just one man? Are you fine with them delaying their hearing, and then delaying their ruling until right before the election?
The indictment was brought 15 months before the election. That's more than enough time to try the case without their interference.
But I'm going to guess critics will provide more excuses for them and suppose the maga Lucy's there would allow the legal football to be kicked and Trump to be tried. But, you have to be completely ignoring what the republican judes and justices did to suppose DOJ was going to be allowed to try Trump before we voted again.
The fix happened right in front of you. Google: Supreme Court and immunity.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):