General Discussion

Response to beaglelover (Reply #26)

SleeplessinSoCal This message was self-deleted by its author.

Edit history

Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More about Rachel Maddow [View all] Cyrano 23 hrs ago OP

Doesn't she still have a partner? I hope so. CTyankee 23 hrs ago #1

As far as I know, she and Susan are still together, thank goodness. ShazzieB 22 hrs ago #8

Why? choie 21 hrs ago #20

Becuse I hope she has someone who cherishes her, loves her and is her partner in life. CTyankee 18 hrs ago #42

It just seemed like a bit of a non-sequitor. choie 17 hrs ago #43

Take no prisoners, Rachel! nolabear 23 hrs ago #2

Me too. Let's go Rachel. n/t iluvtennis 1 hr ago #69

if she's a modern day Woodward and Bernstein, what's her Watergate coverage exactly? What won her a Pulitzer? thebigidea 23 hrs ago #3

She picks up what no one else is covering Cyrano 23 hrs ago #5

Agree! yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #39

have u listened to 'bag man' and/or 'ultra'? mopinko 22 hrs ago #9

My thought exactly. soldierant 20 hrs ago #36

Haven't read her books, but I definitely listened to "Bagman", and "Ultra". Serious stuff. electric_blue68 15 hrs ago #47

we cant turn on everyone. mopinko 6 hrs ago #49

I listen to Rachel, Lawrence, and Joy the most. electric_blue68 6 hrs ago #50

i only catch them on yt, but mopinko 5 hrs ago #57

I listrn to them all via I Tune Radio at their given times. electric_blue68 5 hrs ago #58

yeah, i just started catching rachel as a podcast. they r all out there. mopinko 4 hrs ago #60

I thot my reply posted 🤔 Anyway... electric_blue68 5 hrs ago #54

Sources? She provides in-depth historical documentation that ties to or illuminates current events. Trust_Reality 22 hrs ago #10

Yeah OP's claim is bogus. She's a very important highly intelligent commentator. She is not investigative Bernardo de La Paz 22 hrs ago #13

I LOVE her and wish I knew her personally Trueblue1968 22 hrs ago #15

You've obviously not listened to her podcasts choie 21 hrs ago #21

or "Blowout." Excellent book on fossil fuel industry and footnoted out the wazoo (references). Evolve Dammit 21 hrs ago #22

She's quirky, personable, 'investigates' things and we like her a lot Bonx 20 hrs ago #32

Rachel has an entire staff of researchers, and they do an excellent job FakeNoose 17 hrs ago #46

Will Rachel Maddow Look at this and Report Oneear 23 hrs ago #4

Her primary mission is to report on TSF's first 100 days. ShazzieB 22 hrs ago #12

Dozens of cities had lead levels worse than Flint and there was little coverage about it. MichMan 6 hrs ago #52

And she's doing this after taking a pay cut William Seger 23 hrs ago #6

She is getting 25 mil a year Woodwizard 6 hrs ago #51

When Rachel Maddow talks about Ultra - her series on the pro-Nazi movement dgauss 23 hrs ago #7

I hadn't heard about Sen. Hunt and how McCarthy Ilsa 20 hrs ago #33

McCarthy Roy Cohn Trump TommyT139 2 hrs ago #64

McCarthy Roy Cohn Trump TommyT139 2 hrs ago #65

Rachel VGuerra276 22 hrs ago #11

I will catch her on You Tube. pwb 22 hrs ago #14

We need our own network. Why don't we have one? n/t Peregrine Took 20 hrs ago #30

I read months back that Soros bought about 200 radio stations, nothing since. Maybe who he's hired is carefully.... electric_blue68 15 hrs ago #48

I fear she won't reach those who need to hear her. SleeplessinSoCal 22 hrs ago #16

It's a Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant situation. vanlassie 22 hrs ago #18

Who needs men...I nominate Suzy from Curb DaBronx 21 hrs ago #23

The RW smear machine is relentless and millions lap it up. Hillary was right 30 years ago. Remember? Evolve Dammit 21 hrs ago #24

NBC needs to amp up her personal security Submariner 22 hrs ago #17

She's wonderful but let's also credit her staff. spooky3 22 hrs ago #19

Yes, and she gives them props. yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #40

I like Maddow. But the issue is that some people think this reporting is going to make a difference. erodriguez 21 hrs ago #25

Yep, this household has not watched MSNBC or CNN since the election day. No plans to watch in the future either. beaglelover 21 hrs ago #26

I've started bits and pieces from Nicolle. Wallace SleeplessinSoCal 20 hrs ago #35

This message was self-deleted by its author SleeplessinSoCal 19 hrs ago #38

I don't see MSNBC and CNN as equivalent... yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #41

Maybe it will make a difference and maybe it won't but doing nothing is not an option. Deuxcents 21 hrs ago #27

Watching TV is doing nothing. erodriguez 21 hrs ago #28

Rachel's research and her desire to inform is what I'm referring to..watching her on tv is the means to get that info Deuxcents 21 hrs ago #29

If that's all you do. Trueblue Texan 5 hrs ago #55

Dont know if thats exactly true GusBob 1 hr ago #67

It might of made a difference before the election questionseverything 20 hrs ago #37

It makes a difference to me. Duncan Grant 17 hrs ago #44

Agreed Rikki Tikki Tumbo 1 hr ago #68

I have had some issues but ... mntleo2 20 hrs ago #31

So good to "see" you again. How are you doing? niyad 3 hrs ago #61

I really like Rachel's style; her personality, her commentary, her ability to penetrate to the nitty-gritty of the thin. patphil 20 hrs ago #34

She's demonstrating leadership. Duncan Grant 17 hrs ago #45

Preaching to the choir MichMan 6 hrs ago #53

There are a whole lot of folks doing five days a week for months or years HereForTheParty 5 hrs ago #56

We need Air America Part Deux! marcopolo63 5 hrs ago #59

Great news jayschool2013 3 hrs ago #62

Rachel is very good at highlighting the work of other good people ... TomWilm 3 hrs ago #63

Rachel is our Edward R. Murrow... Joinfortmill 2 hrs ago #66

MSNBC is DESPERATE to get many of us back and this is how they are going to try to do it. Not happening with me. ZonkerHarris 1 hr ago #70