Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(90,396 posts)
31. reports dispute that. That financial investigation took place shortly after the arrests of rioters
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 06:29 PM
20 hrs ago


from December 2022:



...so the financial investigation began in earnest in late 2021. Garland took his oath in March of that year.

He not only handled the Capitol riot prosecutions which resulted in over 1200 convictions, but ran the Trump probe at the same time. He was already getting cooperation from the riot leaders before he formally turned to the WH, and none of that happens on the spur of the moment.

We need to be real about the challenges for an incoming AG, and stop assuming he cared any less about these crimes than any of us. Almost ALL of the evidence he used in the indictments came from his boss's team, and his DOJ defended all of it in myriad, successive courts to make it available to use in grand juries and in courts.

Smith reportedly came onboard a 'fast moving investigation' and inherited over 20 Garland prosecutors who had already gathered more evidence than Mueller had when he took charge of his own investigation.

receipts:



From Mike Pence to ‘fake’ electors, here’s who has testified to the January 6 grand jury or met with prosecutors
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/politics/grand-jury-testimony-list-january-6-trump/index.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So... who's sitting on Vol. 2 now? C_U_L8R Yesterday #1
Cannon, not Garland. You don't get to push Garland to violate the law because you won't suffer consequences Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #4
garland admitted cannon does not have that authority. Think. Again. Yesterday #5
Yes, but until the courts rule against her, her ruling has temporary authority. Breaking it is breaking the law Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #9
She does not have temporary authority... Think. Again. Yesterday #11
They are not in her court, but she has ruled. Until a judge is over-ruled, their rulings hold sway Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #15
judges can't just go ruling on cases that are not in their courts. Think. Again. Yesterday #17
Correct. They can't. But they do. And until they are corrected, their rulings stay current and enforceable Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #21
Yes, they can't. Think. Again. 23 hrs ago #24
. Scrivener7 Yesterday #2
that's a problem bigtree Yesterday #8
. Scrivener7 Yesterday #10
again with the cartoon ass bigtree Yesterday #13
. Scrivener7 Yesterday #14
You have no argument or facts, so you show your ass to a fellow DU member. You can do better. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #16
You're wasting your electrons. It has been conclusively established Ocelot II Yesterday #3
Still with this Garland defense? He failed spectacularly to. prosecute and jail trump. Now the traitor... brush Yesterday #6
it's more valid than the lies spread that Garland was inactive or delayed something. bigtree Yesterday #12
It's not complicated. Not immediately investigating, indicting, prosecuting and convicting trump first thing... brush Yesterday #20
it actually is complicated bigtree 20 hrs ago #30
Nah, Garland failed horribly. Nothing complicated about that fact., on that trump takes over again in a few days... brush 6 hrs ago #39
that's not true at all bigtree 4 hrs ago #40
I say Garland failed horribly, you disagree. Let's leave it at that. brush 4 hrs ago #41
It's not a defence, it is a more balanced perspective. Even Biden was disappointed in Garland Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #18
You realize Smith just skipped over the first 2 years in his report, right? Think. Again. Yesterday #7
You don't cite the Smith report at all iemanja Yesterday #19
please post the quote from President Biden saying the appointment was a mistake bigtree 21 hrs ago #29
Why cling to caring his water? iemanja 20 hrs ago #32
why continue to criticize the AG with things clearly refuted by the report?. bigtree 20 hrs ago #35
Naturally. As a rational adult, that's what I expected. No surprises there. Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #22
Well is this true or not: Stargleamer Yesterday #23
So there was "solid evidence" linking the rioters to Trump, but... Cowpunk 23 hrs ago #25
reports dispute that. That financial investigation took place shortly after the arrests of rioters bigtree 20 hrs ago #31
The problem with that is he didn't appoint the special counsel until a year later than he should have. JohnSJ 23 hrs ago #26
Musk bought Twitter qazplm135 23 hrs ago #27
Respect Jack Smith to say he's wrong, but, republianmushroom 22 hrs ago #28
you posted the Carol Leonning article which just lied about what the DOJ was doing bigtree 20 hrs ago #33
imagine if Garland put this much effort into correcting misinformation! That might have helped. thebigidea 20 hrs ago #34
no prosecutor discusses ongoing prosecutions in public bigtree 19 hrs ago #36
Nor do they discuss cases that they don't want to prosecute for political reasons. republianmushroom 19 hrs ago #37
we know that the AG doesn't just bring forward charges on his own will and whim bigtree 18 hrs ago #38
We all so know trump committed more crimes than what he was indicted for. republianmushroom 1 hr ago #42
that's not the way law works bigtree 31 min ago #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charges Merrick Garland d...»Reply #31