General Discussion

Deuxcents

(20,421 posts)

29. Rachel's research and her desire to inform is what I'm referring to..watching her on tv is the means to get that info

Reply to erodriguez (Reply #28)

Thu Jan 16, 2025, 05:17 PM

15 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DemSoc electric_blue68 Unwind Your Mind

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More about Rachel Maddow [View all] Cyrano 18 hrs ago OP

Doesn't she still have a partner? I hope so. CTyankee 18 hrs ago #1

As far as I know, she and Susan are still together, thank goodness. ShazzieB 17 hrs ago #8

Why? choie 16 hrs ago #20

Becuse I hope she has someone who cherishes her, loves her and is her partner in life. CTyankee 13 hrs ago #42

It just seemed like a bit of a non-sequitor. choie 12 hrs ago #43

Take no prisoners, Rachel! nolabear 18 hrs ago #2

if she's a modern day Woodward and Bernstein, what's her Watergate coverage exactly? What won her a Pulitzer? thebigidea 18 hrs ago #3

She picks up what no one else is covering Cyrano 17 hrs ago #5

Agree! yellow dahlia 14 hrs ago #39

have u listened to 'bag man' and/or 'ultra'? mopinko 17 hrs ago #9

My thought exactly. soldierant 14 hrs ago #36

Haven't read her books, but I definitely listened to "Bagman", and "Ultra". Serious stuff. electric_blue68 9 hrs ago #47

we cant turn on everyone. mopinko 1 hr ago #49

I listen to Rachel, Lawrence, and Joy the most. electric_blue68 1 hr ago #50

i only catch them on yt, but mopinko 3 min ago #57

I thot my reply posted 🤔 Anyway... electric_blue68 13 min ago #54

Sources? She provides in-depth historical documentation that ties to or illuminates current events. Trust_Reality 17 hrs ago #10

Yeah OP's claim is bogus. She's a very important highly intelligent commentator. She is not investigative Bernardo de La Paz 16 hrs ago #13

I LOVE her and wish I knew her personally Trueblue1968 16 hrs ago #15

You've obviously not listened to her podcasts choie 16 hrs ago #21

or "Blowout." Excellent book on fossil fuel industry and footnoted out the wazoo (references). Evolve Dammit 16 hrs ago #22

She's quirky, personable, 'investigates' things and we like her a lot Bonx 15 hrs ago #32

Rachel has an entire staff of researchers, and they do an excellent job FakeNoose 11 hrs ago #46

Will Rachel Maddow Look at this and Report Oneear 17 hrs ago #4

Her primary mission is to report on TSF's first 100 days. ShazzieB 17 hrs ago #12

Dozens of cities had lead levels worse than Flint and there was little coverage about it. MichMan 41 min ago #52

And she's doing this after taking a pay cut William Seger 17 hrs ago #6

She is getting 25 mil a year Woodwizard 49 min ago #51

When Rachel Maddow talks about Ultra - her series on the pro-Nazi movement dgauss 17 hrs ago #7

I hadn't heard about Sen. Hunt and how McCarthy Ilsa 15 hrs ago #33

Rachel VGuerra276 17 hrs ago #11

I will catch her on You Tube. pwb 16 hrs ago #14

We need our own network. Why don't we have one? n/t Peregrine Took 15 hrs ago #30

I read months back that Soros bought about 200 radio stations, nothing since. Maybe who he's hired is carefully.... electric_blue68 9 hrs ago #48

I fear she won't reach those who need to hear her. SleeplessinSoCal 16 hrs ago #16

It's a Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant situation. vanlassie 16 hrs ago #18

Who needs men...I nominate Suzy from Curb DaBronx 16 hrs ago #23

The RW smear machine is relentless and millions lap it up. Hillary was right 30 years ago. Remember? Evolve Dammit 16 hrs ago #24

NBC needs to amp up her personal security Submariner 16 hrs ago #17

She's wonderful but let's also credit her staff. spooky3 16 hrs ago #19

Yes, and she gives them props. yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #40

I like Maddow. But the issue is that some people think this reporting is going to make a difference. erodriguez 16 hrs ago #25

Yep, this household has not watched MSNBC or CNN since the election day. No plans to watch in the future either. beaglelover 16 hrs ago #26

I've started bits and pieces from Nicolle. Wallace SleeplessinSoCal 15 hrs ago #35

This message was self-deleted by its author SleeplessinSoCal 14 hrs ago #38

I don't see MSNBC and CNN as equivalent... yellow dahlia 13 hrs ago #41

Maybe it will make a difference and maybe it won't but doing nothing is not an option. Deuxcents 15 hrs ago #27

Watching TV is doing nothing. erodriguez 15 hrs ago #28

Rachel's research and her desire to inform is what I'm referring to..watching her on tv is the means to get that info Deuxcents 15 hrs ago #29

If that's all you do. Trueblue Texan 7 min ago #55

It might of made a difference before the election questionseverything 14 hrs ago #37

It makes a difference to me. Duncan Grant 11 hrs ago #44

I have had some issues but ... mntleo2 15 hrs ago #31

I really like Rachel's style; her personality, her commentary, her ability to penetrate to the nitty-gritty of the thin. patphil 15 hrs ago #34

She's demonstrating leadership. Duncan Grant 11 hrs ago #45

Preaching to the choir MichMan 40 min ago #53

There are a whole lot of folks doing five days a week for months or years HereForTheParty 3 min ago #56