General Discussion

Cowpunk

(808 posts)

25. So there was "solid evidence" linking the rioters to Trump, but...

Thu Jan 16, 2025, 03:01 PM

23 hrs ago

"The money trail ended up being a dry hole; the comms angle ended up being inconclusive." It seems to me that means that because so little was done in the immediate aftermath of the riot, the main actors were able to destroy the evidence of their collusion. Change my mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

whathehell republianmushroom

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Charges Merrick Garland delayed or dragged his feet on the investigation are proven false in the Smith report [View all] bigtree Yesterday OP

So... who's sitting on Vol. 2 now? C_U_L8R Yesterday #1

Cannon, not Garland. You don't get to push Garland to violate the law because you won't suffer consequences Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #4

garland admitted cannon does not have that authority. Think. Again. Yesterday #5

Yes, but until the courts rule against her, her ruling has temporary authority. Breaking it is breaking the law Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #9

She does not have temporary authority... Think. Again. Yesterday #11

They are not in her court, but she has ruled. Until a judge is over-ruled, their rulings hold sway Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #15

judges can't just go ruling on cases that are not in their courts. Think. Again. Yesterday #17

Correct. They can't. But they do. And until they are corrected, their rulings stay current and enforceable Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #21

Yes, they can't. Think. Again. Yesterday #24

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #2

that's a problem bigtree Yesterday #8

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #10

again with the cartoon ass bigtree Yesterday #13

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #14

You have no argument or facts, so you show your ass to a fellow DU member. You can do better. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #16

You're wasting your electrons. It has been conclusively established Ocelot II Yesterday #3

Still with this Garland defense? He failed spectacularly to. prosecute and jail trump. Now the traitor... brush Yesterday #6

it's more valid than the lies spread that Garland was inactive or delayed something. bigtree Yesterday #12

It's not complicated. Not immediately investigating, indicting, prosecuting and convicting trump first thing... brush Yesterday #20

it actually is complicated bigtree 20 hrs ago #30

Nah, Garland failed horribly. Nothing complicated about that fact., on that trump takes over again in a few days... brush 6 hrs ago #39

that's not true at all bigtree 5 hrs ago #40

I say Garland failed horribly, you disagree. Let's leave it at that. brush 4 hrs ago #41

It's not a defence, it is a more balanced perspective. Even Biden was disappointed in Garland Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #18

You realize Smith just skipped over the first 2 years in his report, right? Think. Again. Yesterday #7

You don't cite the Smith report at all iemanja Yesterday #19

please post the quote from President Biden saying the appointment was a mistake bigtree 21 hrs ago #29

Why cling to caring his water? iemanja 20 hrs ago #32

why continue to criticize the AG with things clearly refuted by the report?. bigtree 20 hrs ago #35

Naturally. As a rational adult, that's what I expected. No surprises there. Oopsie Daisy Yesterday #22

Well is this true or not: Stargleamer Yesterday #23

So there was "solid evidence" linking the rioters to Trump, but... Cowpunk 23 hrs ago #25

reports dispute that. That financial investigation took place shortly after the arrests of rioters bigtree 20 hrs ago #31

The problem with that is he didn't appoint the special counsel until a year later than he should have. JohnSJ 23 hrs ago #26

Musk bought Twitter qazplm135 23 hrs ago #27

Respect Jack Smith to say he's wrong, but, republianmushroom 23 hrs ago #28

you posted the Carol Leonning article which just lied about what the DOJ was doing bigtree 20 hrs ago #33

imagine if Garland put this much effort into correcting misinformation! That might have helped. thebigidea 20 hrs ago #34

no prosecutor discusses ongoing prosecutions in public bigtree 20 hrs ago #36

Nor do they discuss cases that they don't want to prosecute for political reasons. republianmushroom 19 hrs ago #37

we know that the AG doesn't just bring forward charges on his own will and whim bigtree 18 hrs ago #38

We all so know trump committed more crimes than what he was indicted for. republianmushroom 2 hrs ago #42

that's not the way law works bigtree 37 min ago #43