General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(51,822 posts)

15. They are not in her court, but she has ruled. Until a judge is over-ruled, their rulings hold sway

Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:42 PM

Yesterday

I invite those with actual knowledge and experience to review and correct my I-am-not-a-lawyer type of assertions. You could make the same invitation with regard to your post.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Charges Merrick Garland delayed or dragged his feet on the investigation are proven false in the Smith report [View all] bigtree Yesterday OP

So... who's sitting on Vol. 2 now? C_U_L8R Yesterday #1

Cannon, not Garland. You don't get to push Garland to violate the law because you won't suffer consequences Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #4

garland admitted cannon does not have that authority. Think. Again. Yesterday #5

Yes, but until the courts rule against her, her ruling has temporary authority. Breaking it is breaking the law Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #9

She does not have temporary authority... Think. Again. Yesterday #11

They are not in her court, but she has ruled. Until a judge is over-ruled, their rulings hold sway Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #15

judges can't just go ruling on cases that are not in their courts. Think. Again. 23 hrs ago #17

Correct. They can't. But they do. And until they are corrected, their rulings stay current and enforceable Bernardo de La Paz 23 hrs ago #21

Yes, they can't. Think. Again. 23 hrs ago #24

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #2

that's a problem bigtree Yesterday #8

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #10

again with the cartoon ass bigtree Yesterday #13

. Scrivener7 Yesterday #14

You have no argument or facts, so you show your ass to a fellow DU member. You can do better. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 23 hrs ago #16

You're wasting your electrons. It has been conclusively established Ocelot II Yesterday #3

Still with this Garland defense? He failed spectacularly to. prosecute and jail trump. Now the traitor... brush Yesterday #6

it's more valid than the lies spread that Garland was inactive or delayed something. bigtree Yesterday #12

It's not complicated. Not immediately investigating, indicting, prosecuting and convicting trump first thing... brush 23 hrs ago #20

it actually is complicated bigtree 20 hrs ago #30

Nah, Garland failed horribly. Nothing complicated about that fact., on that trump takes over again in a few days... brush 6 hrs ago #39

that's not true at all bigtree 4 hrs ago #40

I say Garland failed horribly, you disagree. Let's leave it at that. brush 4 hrs ago #41

It's not a defence, it is a more balanced perspective. Even Biden was disappointed in Garland Bernardo de La Paz 23 hrs ago #18

You realize Smith just skipped over the first 2 years in his report, right? Think. Again. Yesterday #7

You don't cite the Smith report at all iemanja 23 hrs ago #19

please post the quote from President Biden saying the appointment was a mistake bigtree 20 hrs ago #29

Why cling to caring his water? iemanja 20 hrs ago #32

why continue to criticize the AG with things clearly refuted by the report?. bigtree 19 hrs ago #35

Naturally. As a rational adult, that's what I expected. No surprises there. Oopsie Daisy 23 hrs ago #22

Well is this true or not: Stargleamer 23 hrs ago #23

So there was "solid evidence" linking the rioters to Trump, but... Cowpunk 23 hrs ago #25

reports dispute that. That financial investigation took place shortly after the arrests of rioters bigtree 20 hrs ago #31

The problem with that is he didn't appoint the special counsel until a year later than he should have. JohnSJ 23 hrs ago #26

Musk bought Twitter qazplm135 23 hrs ago #27

Respect Jack Smith to say he's wrong, but, republianmushroom 22 hrs ago #28

you posted the Carol Leonning article which just lied about what the DOJ was doing bigtree 20 hrs ago #33

imagine if Garland put this much effort into correcting misinformation! That might have helped. thebigidea 20 hrs ago #34

no prosecutor discusses ongoing prosecutions in public bigtree 19 hrs ago #36

Nor do they discuss cases that they don't want to prosecute for political reasons. republianmushroom 18 hrs ago #37

we know that the AG doesn't just bring forward charges on his own will and whim bigtree 18 hrs ago #38

We all so know trump committed more crimes than what he was indicted for. republianmushroom 1 hr ago #42

that's not the way law works bigtree 21 min ago #43