Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Cyrano

(15,365 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:31 PM Jan 16

More about Rachel Maddow [View all]

If you missed it, Rachel will be on every weeknight starting next Monday, the day the felon is inaugurated, and continuing for the first hundred days of his (mis)administration. Put bluntly, she's going to 'war" with Trump and his stable full of thugs.

Rachel is not just doing another one hour cable "news" show. For all practical purposes, she is an investigative reporter. She's a modern day Woodward and Bernstein. My guess is she's at work at 6:00 am to prepare for a show that night. It's a schedule that is brutal. And once every fact is checked, every detail is double checked, and everyone she is going to mention is contacted to see if they want to say anything before she goes on the air, she must pull herself together and get in front of the camera. And she doesn't fill much time with guests. It's her, out there all alone most of the time, reading the teleprompter, most of which contains words that she herself wrote.

And, contrary to some opinions, this isn't something she's "doing for the money." That schedule, (given the depth of her reporting), is a statement that she's on a mission. And it's a formula for exhaustion, or a breakdown.

(For those who don't know, Rachel is a Rhodes Scholar, but that doesn't make what she does any easier.)

Yesterday's post on Rachel Maddow:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219906286

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More about Rachel Maddow [View all] Cyrano Jan 16 OP
Doesn't she still have a partner? I hope so. CTyankee Jan 16 #1
As far as I know, she and Susan are still together, thank goodness. ShazzieB Jan 16 #8
Why? choie Jan 16 #20
Becuse I hope she has someone who cherishes her, loves her and is her partner in life. CTyankee Jan 16 #42
It just seemed like a bit of a non-sequitor. choie Jan 16 #43
Take no prisoners, Rachel! nolabear Jan 16 #2
Me too. Let's go Rachel. n/t iluvtennis Jan 17 #69
if she's a modern day Woodward and Bernstein, what's her Watergate coverage exactly? What won her a Pulitzer? thebigidea Jan 16 #3
She picks up what no one else is covering Cyrano Jan 16 #5
Agree! yellow dahlia Jan 16 #39
have u listened to 'bag man' and/or 'ultra'? mopinko Jan 16 #9
My thought exactly. soldierant Jan 16 #36
Haven't read her books, but I definitely listened to "Bagman", and "Ultra". Serious stuff. electric_blue68 Jan 16 #47
we cant turn on everyone. mopinko Jan 17 #49
I listen to Rachel, Lawrence, and Joy the most. electric_blue68 Jan 17 #50
i only catch them on yt, but mopinko Jan 17 #57
I listrn to them all via I Tune Radio at their given times. electric_blue68 Jan 17 #58
yeah, i just started catching rachel as a podcast. they r all out there. mopinko Jan 17 #60
I thot my reply posted 🤔 Anyway... electric_blue68 Jan 17 #54
Sure, but that's not investigative journalism. Just expanding into the lucrative historical podcast market thebigidea Jan 17 #71
Sources? She provides in-depth historical documentation that ties to or illuminates current events. Trust_Reality Jan 16 #10
Yeah OP's claim is bogus. She's a very important highly intelligent commentator. She is not investigative Bernardo de La Paz Jan 16 #13
I LOVE her and wish I knew her personally Trueblue1968 Jan 16 #15
You've obviously not listened to her podcasts choie Jan 16 #21
or "Blowout." Excellent book on fossil fuel industry and footnoted out the wazoo (references). Evolve Dammit Jan 16 #22
She's quirky, personable, 'investigates' things and we like her a lot Bonx Jan 16 #32
Rachel has an entire staff of researchers, and they do an excellent job FakeNoose Jan 16 #46
Will Rachel Maddow Look at this and Report Oneear Jan 16 #4
Her primary mission is to report on TSF's first 100 days. ShazzieB Jan 16 #12
Dozens of cities had lead levels worse than Flint and there was little coverage about it. MichMan Jan 17 #52
And she's doing this after taking a pay cut William Seger Jan 16 #6
She is getting 25 mil a year Woodwizard Jan 17 #51
When Rachel Maddow talks about Ultra - her series on the pro-Nazi movement dgauss Jan 16 #7
I hadn't heard about Sen. Hunt and how McCarthy Ilsa Jan 16 #33
McCarthy Roy Cohn Trump TommyT139 Jan 17 #64
McCarthy Roy Cohn Trump TommyT139 Jan 17 #65
Rachel VGuerra276 Jan 16 #11
I will catch her on You Tube. pwb Jan 16 #14
We need our own network. Why don't we have one? n/t Peregrine Took Jan 16 #30
I read months back that Soros bought about 200 radio stations, nothing since. Maybe who he's hired is carefully.... electric_blue68 Jan 16 #48
I fear she won't reach those who need to hear her. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 16 #16
It's a Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant situation. vanlassie Jan 16 #18
Who needs men...I nominate Suzy from Curb DaBronx Jan 16 #23
The RW smear machine is relentless and millions lap it up. Hillary was right 30 years ago. Remember? Evolve Dammit Jan 16 #24
NBC needs to amp up her personal security Submariner Jan 16 #17
She's wonderful but let's also credit her staff. spooky3 Jan 16 #19
Yes, and she gives them props. yellow dahlia Jan 16 #40
I like Maddow. But the issue is that some people think this reporting is going to make a difference. erodriguez Jan 16 #25
Yep, this household has not watched MSNBC or CNN since the election day. No plans to watch in the future either. beaglelover Jan 16 #26
I've started bits and pieces from Nicolle. Wallace SleeplessinSoCal Jan 16 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author SleeplessinSoCal Jan 16 #38
I don't see MSNBC and CNN as equivalent... yellow dahlia Jan 16 #41
Maybe it will make a difference and maybe it won't but doing nothing is not an option. Deuxcents Jan 16 #27
Watching TV is doing nothing. erodriguez Jan 16 #28
Rachel's research and her desire to inform is what I'm referring to..watching her on tv is the means to get that info Deuxcents Jan 16 #29
If that's all you do. Trueblue Texan Jan 17 #55
Dont know if thats exactly true GusBob Jan 17 #67
It might of made a difference before the election questionseverything Jan 16 #37
It makes a difference to me. Duncan Grant Jan 16 #44
Agreed Rikki Tikki Tumbo Jan 17 #68
I have had some issues but ... mntleo2 Jan 16 #31
So good to "see" you again. How are you doing? niyad Jan 17 #61
I really like Rachel's style; her personality, her commentary, her ability to penetrate to the nitty-gritty of the thin. patphil Jan 16 #34
She's demonstrating leadership. Duncan Grant Jan 16 #45
Preaching to the choir MichMan Jan 17 #53
There are a whole lot of folks doing five days a week for months or years HereForTheParty Jan 17 #56
We need Air America Part Deux! marcopolo63 Jan 17 #59
Great news jayschool2013 Jan 17 #62
Rachel is very good at highlighting the work of other good people ... TomWilm Jan 17 #63
Rachel is our Edward R. Murrow... Joinfortmill Jan 17 #66
MSNBC is DESPERATE to get many of us back and this is how they are going to try to do it. Not happening with me. ZonkerHarris Jan 17 #70
Thx for bringing this to our attention. Dr Maddow is an exceptional researcher & passionate presenter... Hekate Jan 17 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More about Rachel Maddow