General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jack Smith comes to Merrick Garland's defense [View all]bigtree
(91,778 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:33 PM - Edit history (1)
...it's where ordinary people discuss news and events of the day.
What should occur in a discussion of events is a presentation of facts, which I have from two sources familiar with the subject at hand (Politico and the SC report). What I would ideally want from the post is a discussion of those facts presented.
I get from your post that's none of that is your thing.
That's okay. I won't characterize or try to respond to what you feel about it all. I'd prefer a factual discussion about what actually happened in the investigations and prosecutions, rather than just continuing the speculation and conjecture that occurred when the facts of the investigation weren't public and known but were just imagined and projected.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):