Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Frasier Balzov

(4,410 posts)

3. Was it correct for the judicial branch

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Wed Jan 15, 2025, 01:52 AM

Jan 2025

to allow voters to decide what to do with such a notorious criminal?

It has harmed respect for the law. History will show what a grievous, self-destructive mistake it was.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Skittles SunSeeker

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith's report is just a blip on the radar [View all] In It to Win It Jan 2025 OP

He made a bet that his handpicked judges mattered more Blues Heron Jan 2025 #1

Had he lost the election, that would have mattered less In It to Win It Jan 2025 #2

They put him back on the ballot after he was correctly taken off. It never should have gotten to the election stage Blues Heron Jan 2025 #5

But it did get to the election stage... and people voted for him, and he won. In It to Win It Jan 2025 #6

Was it correct for the judicial branch Frasier Balzov Jan 2025 #3

While it's repulsive, think you nailed it. People/voters just didn't think his criminality mattered at polls. Silent Type Jan 2025 #4

Historians will find it important iemanja Jan 2025 #8

Maybe. We won't live to see it unfortunately, and historians may be predominantly white wing in future. Silent Type Jan 2025 #9

Wow, you've mapped out the entire future iemanja Jan 2025 #10

If you want to keep minimizing it iemanja Jan 2025 #7

The impact Cirsium Jan 2025 #11