Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(91,778 posts)
8. the 'small fry'
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 07:50 PM
Jan 2025

...was what the celebrated Jan 6 committee focused the most on, looking for connections between the rioters and the Trump WH.

Indeed, one of the FIRST efforts Garland made was to look for ties between the rioters and Trump, directing the investigation of financial connections and communications between rioters and WH confidants like Roger Stone, as well as activities out of the Willard Hotel where Oath Keepers were know to be organizing their assault on the Capitol.

It made pefect sense for DOJ to investigate those ties, especially since the Trump supporting rioters arrested produced over a dozen willing to cooperate with DOJ.

Even though the report states that they didn't find the collusion they were looking for, it makes no sense to criticize them for looking.

Moreover, that certainly wasn't the only effort Garland's team made in the early days of his term. It's really specious to criticize the effort because he was not only doing the heavy lifting that produced over 1200 prosecutions of dangerous, often violent Trump supporters, but was also handling the investigation he ordered to reach all the way to the top of the Trump cabal at the very same time.

There wasn't so much as a slight pause in that effort when Smith was brought in to take it home, and no evidence was ignored or left uninvestigated, the vast majority of it already subpoenaed and resolved through appeals courts before Smith came aboard. The rest was defended in successive courts well after that appointment by Garland's DOJ.

Smith actually took tome to explain in his report that Merrick Garland had taken NO action to impede his investigation or prosecution.

In fact, Smith came aboard what was described at the time as a 'fast moving investigation, ' inheriting over 20 Garland prosecutors and more evidence than Mueller inherited at the time of his appointment.

receipts:


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/28/us/politics/trump-investigation-thomas-windom.html


https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/11/politics/jack-smith-special-counsel-high-profile-moves-trump-criminal-investigations/index.html



From Mike Pence to ‘fake’ electors, here’s who has testified to the January 6 grand jury or met with prosecutors
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/politics/grand-jury-testimony-list-january-6-trump/index.html

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting mr715 Jan 2025 #1
Yeah, it's a shame garland waited until he got the J6 committee stuff. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #2
I don't know. While I appreciate Smith's defense of Garland, I still despise the way he handled the whole thing, after SWBTATTReg Jan 2025 #3
I didn't see it as "defending" garland.... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #4
Well, good. I don't think Garland deserves any defending, and IMHO, he's going to be defending his calls for years and SWBTATTReg Jan 2025 #6
Yeah, I guess he thought he was more clever than... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #7
He should have realized, DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #16
the 'small fry' bigtree Jan 2025 #8
Here we go again. William769 Jan 2025 #30
if he had chosen Timewas Jan 2025 #5
you must have forgotten that the maga majority on the SC is at the end of any series of certain appeals bigtree Jan 2025 #10
He did nothing Timewas Jan 2025 #12
revisionism bigtree Jan 2025 #13
Walk us through exactly how a trial could have been "forced" to happen before the election Fiendish Thingy Jan 2025 #19
As if he "should have chosen," huh? ancianita Jan 2025 #22
Smith joins Mueller, Fitzgerald, Hur, etc. Silent Type Jan 2025 #9
all different prosecutions bigtree Jan 2025 #11
K&R Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #14
I think what it shows is the weakness in our justice system, that the processes can be dragged out ad nauseum. What is Evolve Dammit Jan 2025 #15
A LOT of cases in our justice system take years if defendants can afford counsel that ancianita Jan 2025 #23
Best justice for those who can afford it. I guess that is a huge point. Evolve Dammit Jan 2025 #25
So...? What do you think? ancianita Jan 2025 #28
I will continue to complain about cases that should have been brought that didn't happen. Especially when the stakes Evolve Dammit Jan 2025 #36
How's that working out for you so far? ancianita Jan 2025 #41
TY for this -- I so appreciate fact-based commentary Hekate Jan 2025 #17
Don't care. Iggo Jan 2025 #18
Smith can cover for Garland all he wants, and I haven't read the article at the link ... aggiesal Jan 2025 #20
it's stating the facts of the investigation bigtree Jan 2025 #34
That's a long response ... aggiesal Jan 2025 #37
that's proven false by what I posted, and what's in the report bigtree Jan 2025 #39
Of course he would. Jack Smith is a prosecutor who tells the truth. ancianita Jan 2025 #21
I have eyes edhopper Jan 2025 #24
lol bigtree Jan 2025 #31
Why would other articles edhopper Jan 2025 #35
this is a discussion board, not a news site. bigtree Jan 2025 #38
You see your democracy almost destroyed and don't go after the ones in charge for the longest time? GreenWave Jan 2025 #26
Garland's DOJ began investigating the Trump WH in 2021 bigtree Jan 2025 #40
My thoughts, looking back. bluestarone Jan 2025 #27
Thank you sir! William769 Jan 2025 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Jan 2025 #33
LMAO BannonsLiver Jan 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack Smith comes to Merri...»Reply #8