Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal YouTubers

nuxvomica

(14,338 posts)

3. The Colorado Supreme ruled "clear and convincing evidence"

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)

Sat Jun 6, 2026, 07:50 AM

Saturday

That Trump had engaged in an insurrection. This was determined in litigation in a district court to which Trump was a party. That finding was not refuted in the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Trump v Anderson. This fully litigated finding of fact should weigh heavily in the BBC case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pucks mom raging moderate Fla Dem dave99 Rhiannon12866

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Court BLUNDER TRIGGERS 47 Subpoenas...INCLUDING Jack Smith!!! - Legal AF [View all] Rhiannon12866 Saturday OP

K & R malaise Saturday #1

Thanks! Rhiannon12866 Saturday #2

The Colorado Supreme ruled "clear and convincing evidence" nuxvomica Saturday #3

Yes and we Coloradans are damned proud ... RobertDevereaux Saturday #4

It was actually the trial court judge melm00se Saturday #5

ding.. this AllaN01Bear Saturday #6

Kicked and recommended Uncle Joe Saturday #7