Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cannabis

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

5. Its true, impairment should be the standard.

Reply to n2doc (Original post)

Thu May 12, 2016, 04:39 PM

May 2016

And frankly there are people driving around impaired by a lot of things, not the least of which is their cell phones.

It goes without saying that no one should get behind the wheel if they've been imbibing anything mind-altering. I had a friend killed by a drunk driver.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Blood THC levels after smoking pot are useless in defining “too high to drive” [View all] n2doc May 2016 OP

Ding a freaking ling ghostsinthemachine May 2016 #1

Reefer Madness is undetectable!!! Mnpaul May 2016 #2

If a person isn't driving irratically puffy socks May 2016 #3

There is only one true test. The Johnny Cash field sobriety cake test CentralMass May 2016 #4

Its true, impairment should be the standard. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #5