Interfaith Group

rug

(82,333 posts)

8. You're confusing confidentiality with privilege.

Thu Jul 10, 2014, 10:46 AM

Jul 2014

This amendment changes the holder of the privilege from the penitent to the priest.

A minister is only obliged to keep such an offence secret if he or she is reasonably satisfied that the penitent has already reported the offence to police.

Do you want a priest to make that subjective determination?

That's not how either the attorney/client or the doctor/patient privilege works. Those hold that there is no privilege in the first place if there is an ongoing crime.

There are very strong policy reasons for the privilege.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Australia lifts the seal of the confession [View all] hrmjustin Jul 2014 OP

That's a mistake. rug Jul 2014 #1

I tend to agree, but not fully.... goldent Jul 2014 #3

Absolutely! hrmjustin Jul 2014 #6

It's a very bad mistake. okasha Jul 2014 #2

No, not at all skepticscott Jul 2014 #4

You're confusing confidentiality with privilege. rug Jul 2014 #8

The Anglican Chur c h of Australia has gone downhill since they picked an Archbishop that hrmjustin Jul 2014 #7

I have the impression that the Australian Church okasha Jul 2014 #9

I believe so but some of the clergy think that it is a Baptist denomination when it is not. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #10

I think this is a huge mistake. It is destroying the cornerstone of a sacrament. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #5

Try looking at it like this: Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #11

It destroys the sacrment. We would never go along with this in the Episcopal Church. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #12

Try looking at it like this. okasha Jul 2014 #13

I have considered it Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #14

That's not what this amendment is about. rug Jul 2014 #15