I posted this article thinking it would be good for discussion. The author used a provocative title which can be dangerous because unless you read the article it gives a misleading impression.
To summarize, the author says that everyone has unfounded beliefs, and these beliefs can be dangerous, or can be greatly beneficial.
But the article leads to this conclusion...
If someone tells me they believe something is true but cannot prove it, I can speak with that person. I can say, You have beliefs, and I have beliefs. I cant prove mine, you cant prove yours. I can ask that person, Just what sort of a world do you think these beliefs will take us to? Thats a great measuring stick. Because if both of us agree on the same goal, we can work together.
But if that person tells me that if I dont believe what they believe its because Im ignorant, stupid and insane
well, you get the idea. I cant see that as a route to a happy world.
All this means that no one has to give up their beliefs in order to live peacefully with everyone else. No one has to even compromise in the slightest. That would be nothing less than a death knell to the magnificent patchwork of wisdoms and cultures that multiculturalism purports to preserve.
This is the except I should have used in the OP, as it is the essence of the Interfaith group.
The article is very well thought out, and encourage people to read it. My only complaint is he should have left atheism out of it - I think it is a little mean spirited and doesn't add anything.