Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
7. The point is, that if the AWB was in place, and the
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 07:23 AM
Mar 2013

guns & mags Nancy Lanza had easy access to and allowed her gun fucker son to have such easy access to, weren't so easy to get, all the kids would probably NOT be dead. And neither would some portion of all those others massacred in similiar ways, AND all those yet to be massacred in the future.

Get it now?

Gun fuckers suck. Once 'law abiding' gun fuckers suddenly aren't, they tend to want to kill a bunch of people with guns. So there is great interest it trying to limit the carnage they can carry out. One good way is to substantially limit the guns and accoutrements they have access to.

That's the point.

A much better question then yours is, why not pass the law?
There is actually NO good reason not to.

Gun owners can still enjoy the liberies of self defense, serve in militias, hunt, plink, & use their guns in other lawful manners - whatever gets 'em off. Yes it is understood they may have to change their habits to enjoy their hobby if it gets a bit too cramped or inconvenienced by new regulations. But it's worth it.


[URL=/][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

Uploaded with [URL=http://imageshack.us]ImageShack.us[/URL]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Biden, Newtown parents ch...»Reply #7