Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

enough

(13,491 posts)
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 07:34 PM Feb 2014

NYT Olympics coverage: "Extreme Park Crashes Taking Outsize Toll on Women" [View all]

I'd be interested to know the thoughts of this group on this story.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/sports/olympics/extreme-park-crashes-taking-outsize-toll-on-women.html?hp

snip>

And most of the injuries have been sustained by women.

Through Monday night, a review of the events at the Extreme Park counted at least 22 accidents that either forced athletes out of the competition or, if on their final run, required medical attention. Of those, 16 involved women. The injury rate is higher when considering that the men’s fields are generally larger.

snip>

But unlike some of the time-honored sports of risk, including Alpine skiing, luge and ski jumping, there are few concessions made for women. For both sexes, the walls of the halfpipe are 22 feet tall. The slopestyle course has the same tricky rails and the same massive jumps. The course for ski cross and snowboard cross, a six-person race to the finish over jumps and around icy banked curves, is the same for men and women. The jumps for aerials are the same height. The bumps in moguls play no gender favorites.

“Most of the courses are built for the big show, for the men,” said Kim Lamarre of Canada, the bronze medalist in slopestyle skiing, where the competition was delayed a few times by spectacular falls. “I think they could do more to make it safer for women.”

Compare the sports with downhill skiing, in which women have their own course, one that is shorter and less difficult to navigate. Or luge, in which female sliders start lower on the track than the men. Or ski jump, in which women were finally allowed to participate this year, but only on the smaller of the two hills. The Olympics have a history — sexist, perhaps — of trying to protect women from the perils of some sports.

snip> MORE

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wasn't there issues from the very start with dangerous courses? ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #1
I know there were concerns the Slope Style course was too dangerous BainsBane Feb 2014 #2
Practice for the real thing Dems2002 Feb 2014 #3
I wonder if Russia ramped it up ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #4
My daughter laughed at this thread. proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #5
Big difference between Olympics level extreme sports and pig hunting ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #6
That is true. proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #7
Excellent ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #10
Which women here said they wanted it "both ways"? BainsBane Feb 2014 #8
I don't get the "women want it both ways" comment. sufrommich Feb 2014 #9
They want equality but proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #11
That's not really what equality means though, sufrommich Feb 2014 #12
Really proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #15
Are there different training standards in the military? sufrommich Feb 2014 #16
There is a big debate about this every few years. proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #19
Lol,your daughter sounds like she's sufrommich Feb 2014 #20
I think it has to do more with size and strengthdifferences ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #13
I still have to smile proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #17
My daughter was very similar in the army ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #21
That is not what most of the athletes in the piece said BainsBane Feb 2014 #14
That is my point. proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #18
So then what is the problem? Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»NYT Olympics coverage: &q...»Reply #0