Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,510 posts)
11. Just for fun
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:28 PM
Feb 2014
The closest living relatives of humans are chimpanzees (genus Pan) and gorillas (genus Gorilla).With the sequencing of both the human and chimpanzee genome, current estimates of similarity between human and chimpanzee DNA sequences range between 95% and 99%. By using the technique called a molecular clock which estimates the time required for the number of divergent mutations to accumulate between two lineages, the approximate date for the split between lineages can be calculated. The gibbons (Hylobatidae) and orangutans (genus Pongo) were the first groups to split from the line leading to the humans, then gorillas (genus Gorilla) followed by the chimpanzees and bonobos (genus Pan). The splitting date between human and chimpanzee lineages is placed around 4–8 million years ago during the late Miocene epoch.
There is little fossil evidence for the divergence of the gorilla, chimpanzee and hominin lineages.

The earliest fossils that have been proposed as members of the hominin lineage are Sahelanthropus tchadensis dating from 7 million years ago, and Orrorin tugenensis dating from 5.7 million years ago and Ardipithecus kadabba dating to 5.6 million years ago. Each of these has been argued to be a bipedal ancestor of later hominins, but in each case the claims have been contested. It is also possible that either of these species is an ancestor of another branch of African apes, or that they represent a shared ancestor between hominins and other Hominoidea. The question of the relation between these early fossil species and the hominin lineage is still to be resolved. From these early species the australopithecines arose around 4 million years ago diverged into robust (also called Paranthropus) and gracile branches, one of which (possibly A. garhi) went on to become ancestors of the genus Homo.

The earliest members of the genus Homo are Homo habilis which evolved around 2.3 million years ago. Homo habilis is the first species for which we have positive evidence of use of stone tools. The brains of these early hominins were about the same size as that of a chimpanzee, and their main adaptation was bipedalism as an adaptation to terrestrial living. During the next million years a process of encephalization began, and with the arrival of Homo erectus in the fossil record, cranial capacity had doubled. Homo erectus were the first of the hominina to leave Africa, and these species spread through Africa, Asia, and Europe between 1.3 to 1.8 million years ago.

One population of H. erectus, also sometimes classified as a separate species Homo ergaster, stayed in Africa and evolved into Homo sapiens. It is believed that these species were the first to use fire and complex tools. The earliest transitional fossils between H. ergaster/erectus and archaic humans are from Africa such as Homo rhodesiensis, but seemingly transitional forms are also found at Dmanisi, Georgia. These descendants of African H. erectus spread through Eurasia from ca. 500,000 years ago evolving into H. antecessor, H. heidelbergensis and H. neanderthalensis. The earliest fossils of anatomically modern humans are from the Middle Paleolithic, about 200,000 years ago such as the Omo remains of Ethiopia and the fossils of Herto sometimes classified as Homo sapiens idaltu.

Later fossils of archaic Homo sapiens from Skhul in Israel and Southern Europe begin around 90,000 years ago.


So evolutionary wise, we started diverging from what we think of apes ape's 4--8. million years million years ago, this doesn't change the classification, but that never was the point was it?

I don't use wiki for every thing these days but this not a bad article on humans

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human


And while a couple were trying to say something like this- the disrupters never let it get to a good kinks song level


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No you didn't. What happened in that thread was that a lot of asses got a chance to show off Squinch Feb 2014 #1
I love that ALL of them saw through it. Good Jury! cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #2
all the jury saw, and surprisingly not the men arguing their position because they need to hold onto seabeyond Feb 2014 #5
I think the Alerter is the one TROLLING like a fucking BOSS Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #3
first i was gonna fall in love with juror one, then one and three... screw it, love 'em all. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #4
Juror #4 is getting extra points from me for including Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #6
I understood what you were trying to say. sufrommich Feb 2014 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #8
I've seen other ones like this too. boston bean Feb 2014 #9
Meh ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #10
Just for fun ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #11
Thanks for the Kinks. Had forgotten that gem. Not to mention thanks for all the info. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #25
Oh look. MadrasT Feb 2014 #12
ISM.... loved yours. madrast, gonna love reading yours, first i need a hot fudge sundae seabeyond Feb 2014 #13
lack of criticial thinking, similar to how some used the darwin to try to push their libertarian JI7 Feb 2014 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Feb 2014 #15
"an ideological agenda buried in the mire of shoddy science" redqueen Feb 2014 #16
This part is especially delicious: MadrasT Feb 2014 #17
Yes it is. redqueen Feb 2014 #19
It's really a pretty disgusting premise to argue sufrommich Feb 2014 #18
That is one of the things I find most deplorable about the argument. MadrasT Feb 2014 #20
"Heteronormative" is the word I was trying to think of. sufrommich Feb 2014 #22
I've had this argument so many times I have "heteronormative bullshit" on the tip of my tongue. MadrasT Feb 2014 #23
Well,now I know who to hunt down when sufrommich Feb 2014 #24
Excellent points. nt redqueen Feb 2014 #21
that is what they did, at the same time, accusing us of being the ones doing it. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #28
Posting Like A Boss - Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #26
The Evo-psych proponents used chimpanzees to justify "rape as adaptive as adaptive behavior" ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #29
I did not know about the chimp angle. MadrasT Feb 2014 #30
I hope whomever alerted your post Texasgal Feb 2014 #27
song dedication for you Boston Bean (because ... doors) Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Well, I succeeded in gett...»Reply #11