History of Feminism

boston bean

(36,620 posts)

7. Because it exists for one biological sex and not the other is fair game, and a fair equivalency.

Tue Feb 11, 2014, 12:25 PM

Feb 2014

Because the religious reasons against abortion are not based in science. Religions which are extremely patriarchal.

One could just as easily write a book of stories about spilt seed and jacking off and what an abomination it is. And never say anything about abortion.

One might go hmmmmmm... that seems a bit sexist...

Take it from the group of persons who experience the outcomes of this extreme religiosity that it is absolutely sexist.

Possibly, one could say and go to their congress persons that many men of a certain age cease to have erections, we could call that the will of God. Seems silly, right... Well, many women feel the exact same freaking way about the choice they make concerning their reproduction. Men do get erections and their penises are a function of reproduction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's odd how managing the menfolk's sexytimes never turns into a movement [View all] eridani Feb 2014 OP

False equivalency Android3.14 Feb 2014 #1

Interesting that insurance companies NEVER covered birth control until eridani Feb 2014 #2

The attempts to restrict abortion are heavily based in religion. boston bean Feb 2014 #3

Not what I meant Android3.14 Feb 2014 #4

That was the point. There is no religious oppostion to ED treatments. boston bean Feb 2014 #5

But it isn't a point Android3.14 Feb 2014 #6

Because it exists for one biological sex and not the other is fair game, and a fair equivalency. boston bean Feb 2014 #7

Raised German Catholic Android3.14 Feb 2014 #8

What you are not understanding is that by rigidly controlling women's reproductive rights, Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #10

Part of your statement is true, but not the part that would weaken my argument. Android3.14 Feb 2014 #11

So you you're just here for a laugh? JTFrog Feb 2014 #12

Three people have tried to explain where you are wrong, and yet you still don't get it. Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #13

Unamused Android3.14 Feb 2014 #14

Your words: Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #15

And if I'd said Android3.14 Feb 2014 #16

i guess my argument would be more in tuned to.... viagra and pumps more for medical conditions seabeyond Feb 2014 #17

At last, I see something relevant: Sheldon Cooper Feb 2014 #18

Isn't that the 4th law of posting? JTFrog Feb 2014 #19

lol redqueen Feb 2014 #20

adn i didnt even read his posts but THIS... says who he is and what the fuck his agenda is. seabeyond Feb 2014 #22

you know what. if i am getting what you are saying, i am so damn tired of it. we have one, seabeyond Feb 2014 #21

Yep. Somehow the whole no sex unless it's for procreation rule is just ignored... but redqueen Feb 2014 #9

at least huskster acknowledge the female libido. i give him a huge ass thumbs up for that one. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #23