History of Feminism

It is the difference between sexuality and reproduction.
The article obviously equates a man having access to boner pills and pumps with a woman having access to contraception and abortion services, and because only one of these (access to reproductive services) provokes a movement to deny or insure access, the OP sees hypocrisy. While provocative, it is a false equivalency.
Let's turn it around.
Suppose a group of people attempted to deny access to skin cancer treatments. Should those who support access to cancer detection services wag their fingers at the members of the opposition group who use Oil of Olay?
It would be silly.
And that is why this particular outrage by some members of the reproductive rights camp does nothing except annoy the opposition and make aging allies in your own camp (such as myself) feel uncomfortable, because we can still have sex on occasion.
The ability to have sex is in a different class than the ability to control the number of offspring, just as the ability to have smooth skin is in a different class than the ability to control cancer.