History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: The vilification of Mia Farrow on DU [View all]BainsBane
(55,318 posts)The judge said as much. One doctor submitted a statement but refused to submit for cross examination. There was no way for the judge to gauge the truthfulness, methods, or reliabilty of their statement. That coupled with the fact they destroyed their notes, a highly irregular move, and failed to follow professional guidelines in other ways led the judge to rule it non-credible.
Moses may claim that now, but there was no evidence presented in the custody case for that. None.
The judge said there was no evidence of brainwashing. The judged ruled the New Haven team's report uncredible for a host of reasons he makes very clear, which you would know if you bothered to read the legal ruling.
Dylan's story was consistent, not only from 1992 to the present but also to the various authorities she told her account to after it occured: those include a family doctor, the therapist hired by Woody Allen, and the state therapist appointed by the family court. She also told Mia.