Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Hey "Radical" Feminists [View all]cinnabonbon
(860 posts)28. Read them and
it's clear that saying "yes means yes" is a bit too simplistic for complicated situations like this. If we do start to talk about power hierarchies and such, then obviously yes can given after, for example coercion or under patriarchy, and it won't count as real consent. I will have to think a bit closer on this, to see what branch of feminism fits me best. I enjoyed how she broke it down with agency feminism, for example. "This yes means yes."
I think this quote was great:
The [sexist] assumption is that women can be unequal to men economically, socially, culturally, politically, and in religion, but the moment they have sexual interactions, they are free and equal. Thats the assumption and I think it ought to be thought about, and in particular what consent then means
My view is that when there is force or substantially coercive circumstances between the parties, individual consent is beside the point.
Very very interesting stuff! I think I'll reread it and let it sink in. Thanks so much for sharing, Redq!
![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
(and as a sidenote, I am surprised to see her calling ableism "disablism". I've grown used to seeing the other term more often than disablism, so now I don't know which one is the more acceptable one.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
right wing and left wing opponents of pornography do indeed oppeose it for different reasons
arely staircase
Jan 2014
#6
I'm not super into the whole "agree to disagree" theme on this subject.
Gravitycollapse
Jan 2014
#11
And I think many on the left often uses pro-porn stances as a means of escaping sexual shame
ismnotwasm
Jan 2014
#19
There's a lot of denial going on, for self-described liberals and progressives to be defending this
redqueen
Jan 2014
#25
There is no limit (no bottom) to human cruelty. We are a sick, sick species.
nomorenomore08
Feb 2014
#39