Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Lunacee_2013

(529 posts)

9. Good for you for standing up for your wife.

Reply to Flatulo (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:18 PM

Jan 2014

We need more men like you. And you're right, they just want to get close enough to physically stop women from going into those clinics. They have the same amount of free speech 35 feet away as they do 3.5 inches away.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Abortion Clinics Need Buffer Zones ("You've only got to look to history") [View all] LanternWaste Jan 2014 OP

If the buffer zone is rescinded ismnotwasm Jan 2014 #1

Physical acts of aggression do not remotely fall under free speech. WTF is wrong with people? nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #2

The question seems to be about the size of the buffer One_Life_To_Give Jan 2014 #3

I think the question is about the existence rather than size of the zones. LanternWaste Jan 2014 #4

Perhaps I am overemphasizing Justice Kagan's line of questioning One_Life_To_Give Jan 2014 #5

Free speech my ass. My wife has been assaulted, accosted, impeded, grabbed, cajoled, and blocked Flatulo Jan 2014 #6

This is why they want the 35 foot rule banned,they can't sufrommich Jan 2014 #7

This was back in '84 or '85, and yes, it was quite awful... You've never seen 'god-fearing' people Flatulo Jan 2014 #8

Good for you for standing up for your wife. Lunacee_2013 Jan 2014 #9

Just a note: Lunacee_2013 Jan 2014 #10