Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

CTyankee

(65,556 posts)

7. whether or not she had no issue with it is not the point.

Reply to yeoman6987 (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 12, 2014, 08:00 AM

Jan 2014

If it is a state taxpayer supported institution there can be no unequal treatment between the sexes. You can't have discriminatory policies. It is public, not private. Somebody has to call "foul" on this kind of stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alabama State University to Female President: No Romantic Sleepovers in Home [View all] ismnotwasm Jan 2014 OP

It would be key to discover if male presidents were made to sign a contract with the same clause. Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #1

not only would I be shocked if such a contract ever existed for a male pres... mike_c Jan 2014 #3

The only place where a clause like this might make sense (for both men and women) Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #4

She signed the contract yeoman6987 Jan 2014 #6

whether or not she had no issue with it is not the point. CTyankee Jan 2014 #7

Ignorant yeoman6987 Jan 2014 #8

Oh, it's okay. You were trying to find some answers. CTyankee Jan 2014 #9

I bet that place is lots of fun shenmue Jan 2014 #2

this has got to be unconstitutional cinnabonbon Jan 2014 #5