lol. kind of.
I wrote so many papers, starting in high school, on sexism in advertising. This was a terrific analysis.
The replies were great, too. I was glad to see that jerk "I didn't read the whole thing, but
sucks to be you, ladies" guy got the full wrath of the much smarter people on the board.
Loved this reply (well I loved a lot of them, but I'm not going to copy/paste them all
)
Peeling
01/06/2014 at 6:15 pm
Yep, I can certainly tell you didnt read the article.
I have a 6-year-old daughter. On weekend mornings we all sit in bed together and watch kids telly. According to the TV my daughter is supposed to be either grooming and cleaning up after urinating plastic babies, or painting her face with glittery crap that comes free with pairs of extortionately expensive shoes. In a (frighteningly) few years time, the same boy/girl marketing language the TV is trying to imprint on her will be used to steer her towards certain magazines, and those magazines wont be discussing advances in science and technology, theyll be discussing how best to lose weight, straighten hair and attract the attention of boys.
Marketing and the media is doing its damnedest to turn my wonderful, smart, funny, curious little girl into a creature obsessed with the acquisition of products designed for no purpose other than to make women more pleasing scenery for men. Marketing and the media wants to convince her that she should fit a certain profile literally and figuratively because thats the most efficient way to get her to spend money. They dont care that she loves Minecraft and Ghibli films and proper Lego and hiding from dragons in Skyrim. They dont care that she wants to be a scientist and stop everyone dying when she grows up. Shes a girl, and theyll do anything they can to shepherd her into adulthood as a good little female consumer.
This is not separate but equal. This is gender apartheid every bit as bullshit as the racial kind.