Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Just posted on the admin thread [View all]CTyankee
(65,556 posts)68. where did this happen? How did I miss it?
I have quietly thought that Skinner might not want to have DU go in the direction it seemed to be going against her. But I, of course, could not and would not appear to speak for him.
My sense is that there is an Admin feeling that it would not be a good thing to piss off Feminists on DU. So many of us flocked to DU in the early years because we believed in the humanistic virtue of DU, largely supported by a strong Feminist group. It was part of DU's dna.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Silencing opposition is not a good strategy. It signals weakness in your own message.
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#75
i do not expect people to always agree, and i expect to be wrong, hence i like to listen. i might
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#54
Pro-gun / anti-feminist types are more able to affect the general discourse about these topics.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#24
I had to take a lot of people off ignore to be able to even see that. What a crock.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#15
I don't use ignore, but I was thinking seriously about putting one of them on it.
boston bean
Dec 2013
#17
I was careful to not even read their comments, just Sea's. I don't need that kind of nuttiness
Squinch
Dec 2013
#19
The alerters comments in that HoF hide were ... weird ... to say the least.
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2013
#20
Looks like we have a true old-fashioned witch hunt on our hands, friends. And they sometimes spread.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#13
It really is, but most of the stuff I've been looking at isn't online. It's books that
Squinch
Dec 2013
#66
I don't think she can get PMs. She is locked out for review as Baines stated above. n/t
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2013
#21
She can read them but, she can not reply. Here are the jury results w/ Alerter comment:
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2013
#23
thank you. and thank you for telling ohio joe thank you. that is exactly what i
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#39
thank you for your post. your voice is very much needed and valued. enough said.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#55
true that. and i continue to be blissfully ignorant on all that. just not my thang. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#65
She got two hides yesterday and was flagged, which means she couldn't participate
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#69
Why do some insist on behaving so childishly (and I don't mean anybody from this Group)?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#94
I looked at it because I thought the link was to seabeyond's hidden post.
Sheldon Cooper
Dec 2013
#99