Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Buddhism
In reply to the discussion: Is atheism compatible with Buddhism? [View all]marasinghe
(1,253 posts)10. yes.
just for a start:
https://sites.google.com/site/rahulawhatthebuddha/
quote:
https://sites.google.com/site/rahulawhatthebuddha/the-buddhist-attitude-of-mind
".... Mans position, according to Buddhism, is supreme. Man is his own master, and there is no higher being or power that sits in judgment over his destiny.
One is ones own refuge, who else could be the refuge?[1] said the Buddha. He admonished his disciples to be a refuge to themselves, and never to seek refuge in or help from anybody else.[2] He taught, encouraged and stimulated each person to develop himself and to work out his own emancipation, for man has the power to liberate himself from all bondage through his own personal effort and intelligence. The Buddha says: You should do your work, for the Tathāgatas[3] only teach the way.[4] If the Buddha is to be called a saviour at all, it is only in the sense that he discovered and showed the Path to Liberation, Nirvāṇa. But we must tread the Path ourselves.
It is on this principle of individual responsibility that the Buddha allows freedom to his disciples. In the Mahāparinibbāna-sutta the Buddha says that he never thought of controlling the Sangha (Order of Monks),[5] nor he did want the Sangha to depend on him. He said that there was no esoteric doctrine in his teaching, nothing hidden in the closed-fist of the teacher (ācariya-muṭṭhi), or to put it in other words, there never was anything up his sleeve.[6]
The freedom of thought allowed by the Buddha is unheard of elsewhere in the history of religions. This freedom is necessary because, according to the Buddha, mans emancipation depends on his own realization of Truth, and not on the benevolent grace of a god or any external power as a reward for his obedient good behaviour.
The Buddha once visited a small town called Kesaputta in the kingdom of Kosala. The inhabitants of his town were known by the common name Kālāma. When they heard that the Buddha was in their town, the Kālāmas paid him a visit, and told him:
Sir, there are some recluses and brāhmaṇas who visit Kesaputta. They explain and illumine only their own doctrines, and despise, condemn and spurn others doctrines. Then come other recluses and brāhmaṇas, and they, too, in their turn, explain and illumine only their own doctrines, and despise, condemn and spurn others doctrines. But, for us, Sir, we have always doubt and perplexity as to who among these venerable recluses and brāhmaṇas spoke the truth, and who spoke falsehood.
Then the Buddha gave them this advice unique in the history of religions:
Yes, Kālāmas, it is proper that you have doubt, that you have perplexity, for a doubt has arisen in a matter which is doubtful. Now, look you Kālāmas, do not be led by reports, or tradition, or hearsay. Be not led by the authority of religious texts, nor by mere logic or inference, nor by considering appearances, nor by the delight in speculative opinions, nor by seeming possibilities, nor by the idea: this is our teacher. But, O Kālāmas, when you know for yourselves that certain things are unwholesome (akusala), and wrong, and bad, then give them up And when you know for yourselves that certain things are wholesome (kusala) and good, then accept them and follow them.[7]
The Buddha went even further. He told the bhikkhus that a disciple should examine even the Tathāgata (Buddha) himself, so that he (the disciple) might be fully convinced of the true value of the teacher whom he followed. ...."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Buddhism is something you do and not something you believe. The myriad of images, both wrathful
byeya
Aug 2012
#3
Reincarnation is very important in Mahayana Buddhism, and reincarnation requires faith.
ZombieHorde
Aug 2012
#36
The barrister Christmas Humphries started The Buddhist Society in England in the 1920s.
byeya
Aug 2012
#6
#rug I'm not Buddhist but I don't see how reincarnation can be reconciled with atheism.
iamnotyou
Aug 2012
#11
Neither karma nor rebirth are necessary. You ask what if there is no rebirth?
white_wolf
Aug 2012
#14
Here is the link to the Sutta I mentioned where Buddha addresses the issue of death after Nirvana.
white_wolf
Aug 2012
#18
So what you're saying I think, is that while Buddhism is probably atheistic...
GliderGuider
Aug 2012
#34
Reincarnation does not require gods, so atheism and reincarnation can be compatible.
ZombieHorde
Aug 2012
#37
In my experience, Buddhism is not compatible with an omnipotent being who is except from the laws
byeya
Aug 2012
#30
Red Pine's translation of the Heart Sutra declares all characteristics as empty.
white_wolf
Sep 2012
#51
I think so. I really like Buddhism, but since I do not believe in any of the supernatural aspects
ZombieHorde
Aug 2012
#38
I know you were just being silly, but I love to argue, and I took the opportunity to do so.
ZombieHorde
Aug 2012
#42
I just wanted to come back and say a big thank you to all those that took the time to answer...
truebrit71
Dec 2012
#55